Recently, someone I have a great deal of respect for sent me a couple clips from a guy with a channel called "Hugo Talks". I assume his name is Hugo, but that is all I know about him. So this fellow had what I thought was a very interesting take on the role of all the faces taking point on fighting the covid hoax/great reset steamroller. Hugo thinks the events and organizations that result from them all getting together is all a big Magoffin. I thought this was quite imaginative and original.
Hugo thinks it is a way to get us all to dive headfirst into a morass of pseudo-religious new age hopium, and since you all find all these people producing vast amounts of video material on BitChute, my friend thought it reasonable to ask me if I had any opinion on BitChute as a platform. In other words, "Is BitChute just controlled opposition?"
I have been so busy researching I have not posted an article in a couple weeks. I did six hours of live interviews and posted that last time. I figured it was a lot to process, might be best to let people have time to absorb that, because it was really important information. Most of what you see grabbing headlines right now is rubbish placed there as a distraction anyway, so why comment on any of it?
This however was unique and abstract enough that I could not resist breaking my silence, so I saw an opportunity to get my fingers tapping again. I hope you enjoy my response to these two "Hugo Talks" clips:
TRUMP'S NEW AGE DOCTOR NETWORK / HUGO TALKS ~ PART 1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Sy1CICD6jk4Q/
The Aquarian LUCIFERIAN Agenda / New Age Doctor Network Part 2 / Hugo Talks
https://rumble.com/v13crta-the-aquarian-luciferian-agenda-new-age-doctor-network-part-2-hugo-talks.html
In answer to the question "Is BitChute just controlled opposition?" Here is my response:
I don’t think that is the right question to ask. BitChute is a platform. The people using it can be either controlled or independent. It is open to anyone. I have been watching these Hugo Talks clips. This is a very interesting perspective, made even more interesting by simply hearing someone voice it. He certainly makes some excellent observations.
I have a lot to say about a lot of what he says.
I have noticed the patterns he discusses myself, not the second degree of Sacha Stone thing, that’s new to me, but the steady creep into new age material, the utterly blind political leanings, the clicky-ness amongst them all - Really the MOST suspicious thing about some of these folks, a red flag I always notice, is the appearance of media reach that is incongruent with an almost total absence of effective contact information.
i.e. Where is Del Bigtree's broadcast studio? Who are his relatives? What is the guys phone number, home address, what kind of car does he drive? Does he prefer the Beatles or Elvis?
These days a talking dog can be a world leader, so I would not be surprised to learn at some point that all this time Del Bigtree was nothing more than an animated CGI computer avatar created by a team of Imagineers at Walt Disney.
Hugo casts a wide net and names just about everyone putting out regular material and generally considered to be a covid "social media influencer". Is anyone left? I know some are controlled, but I tend to doubt they ALL are. I have not been able to break into this headliner group and I have been trying for two years! By all rights, given the level of work I have done to earn my way in, I don't think it too arrogant to feel like I SHOULD be part of it. So I admit asking myself certain questions sometimes like; Is this a serious person or a shill? Is this a serious coalition or a honeypot organization?
A serious researcher would care what I have to say I would think. A serious coalition would seek members like me to join with them as valuable contributors. The fact that I lack certain professional credentials only explains so much. It does not dilute the level of the work I have done, it is just a risk to a person with more established credibility in any of the areas I touch to endorse or entertain my research. I have had to accept that as the most likely reason these people ignore me.
Hugo thinks it is a way to get us all to dive headfirst into a morass of pseudo-religious new age hopium, and since you all find all these people producing vast amounts of video material on BitChute, my friend thought it reasonable to ask me if I had any opinion on BitChute as a platform. In other words, "Is BitChute just controlled opposition?"
I have been so busy researching I have not posted an article in a couple weeks. I did six hours of live interviews and posted that last time. I figured it was a lot to process, might be best to let people have time to absorb that, because it was really important information. Most of what you see grabbing headlines right now is rubbish placed there as a distraction anyway, so why comment on any of it?
This however was unique and abstract enough that I could not resist breaking my silence, so I saw an opportunity to get my fingers tapping again. I hope you enjoy my response to these two "Hugo Talks" clips:
TRUMP'S NEW AGE DOCTOR NETWORK / HUGO TALKS ~ PART 1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Sy1CICD6jk4Q/
The Aquarian LUCIFERIAN Agenda / New Age Doctor Network Part 2 / Hugo Talks
https://rumble.com/v13crta-the-aquarian-luciferian-agenda-new-age-doctor-network-part-2-hugo-talks.html
In answer to the question "Is BitChute just controlled opposition?" Here is my response:
I don’t think that is the right question to ask. BitChute is a platform. The people using it can be either controlled or independent. It is open to anyone. I have been watching these Hugo Talks clips. This is a very interesting perspective, made even more interesting by simply hearing someone voice it. He certainly makes some excellent observations.
I have a lot to say about a lot of what he says.
I have noticed the patterns he discusses myself, not the second degree of Sacha Stone thing, that’s new to me, but the steady creep into new age material, the utterly blind political leanings, the clicky-ness amongst them all - Really the MOST suspicious thing about some of these folks, a red flag I always notice, is the appearance of media reach that is incongruent with an almost total absence of effective contact information.
i.e. Where is Del Bigtree's broadcast studio? Who are his relatives? What is the guys phone number, home address, what kind of car does he drive? Does he prefer the Beatles or Elvis?
These days a talking dog can be a world leader, so I would not be surprised to learn at some point that all this time Del Bigtree was nothing more than an animated CGI computer avatar created by a team of Imagineers at Walt Disney.
Hugo casts a wide net and names just about everyone putting out regular material and generally considered to be a covid "social media influencer". Is anyone left? I know some are controlled, but I tend to doubt they ALL are. I have not been able to break into this headliner group and I have been trying for two years! By all rights, given the level of work I have done to earn my way in, I don't think it too arrogant to feel like I SHOULD be part of it. So I admit asking myself certain questions sometimes like; Is this a serious person or a shill? Is this a serious coalition or a honeypot organization?
A serious researcher would care what I have to say I would think. A serious coalition would seek members like me to join with them as valuable contributors. The fact that I lack certain professional credentials only explains so much. It does not dilute the level of the work I have done, it is just a risk to a person with more established credibility in any of the areas I touch to endorse or entertain my research. I have had to accept that as the most likely reason these people ignore me.
That said, I see a few possibilities.
Hugo links all these people through shared beliefs they seem to be adopting and openly promoting. I would think exposing covid scams provides all the shared purpose any of them would need to form a group, so giving anything else top billing is a bit odd, but is that what we should really be focusing on? Build it and they will come, even the loonies are welcome if they work productively to stop a global genocide, right? If the thing motivating them is spiritual enlightenment who cares?
I think new age type stuff mostly coalesce around personal belief systems that catch on, like fashion trends. Not all, but many of the ones that gain momentum have a certain logical reasoning to them which provides credibility, and a certain type of thinker gravitates to many of them because they personally excel at abstract thought and therefore find thought experiments mentally stimulating. Many as there are out there, the popular ones persist and expand in much the same way that most branches of philosophy do.
Is that a bad thing? It can be. When an exploitable group-think pattern spawns a cult. That’s when we know, the life cycle of a particular belief system has reached the end of its useful life cycle, right? For better or worse, as the thoughts of the group reaches maturity the debates slow down and some consensus or conclusion or judgment is broadly reached.
So, if you would describe many of the people Hugo picks on as deep thinkers, highly educated, above average intelligent, well spoken, charismatic, etc.. then this is typically the type of thinker that will entertain a new belief system for a while and pick through its elements. It is a relaxing use of grey matter for me, always has been, but I tend to move on after a bit to another one. I don’t get attached. I observe and consider my own experience, frequently taking away some things and discarding the rest.
At the end of the day I am building my own perspective, and that is my goal. It has never been to adopt someone else's all-encompassing dogma. That is a universal error and always done in a vacuum of critical thinking. I am a leader, not a follower, but I respect my betters and feel like I can recognize real wisdom when I encounter it. When I was asked as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up my response was unusual. My answer was "I want to be wise." I do my best, but I know I am not infallible in my own wisdom, and I know the path to wisdom is a careful journey, that it cannot be completed in a sprint and, if one is serious about it, is a journey that stops only when it is rudely interrupted by death.
Is all this new age crap authenticated Lucis Trust cannon? I don’t think he makes the best case for that. He seems to want that to be true and he wants you to see how likely true it is. Circumstantially, the clue is there, but it is not a smoking gun. Its walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck - but it is a goose. And why the Lucis Trust? Why not the Freemasons, or the Jews, or Tavistock, or the lizard people living in the inner earth or on the back side of the moon?
Don't they all have a similar play book?
I have a lot left to play still, but one thing about this argument that jumped out at me right off the bat was the fact that Hugo does not seem to trust ANY of the people he names. He is looking for a connection that, to me, seems very subjective. I think that distrust is understandable, but a bit abnormal. One can defend a bias, but blanket paranoia creates paralysis. Could this be the goal here? That is the real question he raises, and he offers it as a conclusion, but it is just one possibility, and we should maybe table that for now.
I know some of these names are invested in what they are saying and some are getting paid to say it. Everyone is being fleeced, everyone has less to meet their needs, so there is a basic conflict of interest that could explain some innocent behavior.
Peter McCullough is not a good doctor, his beliefs lead him to poor conclusions and he does not appear to me to be interested in changing his beliefs if that means admitting he was wrong. He is one guy I have exchanged emails with. He talked to me, but he brushed me off.
Hugo links all these people through shared beliefs they seem to be adopting and openly promoting. I would think exposing covid scams provides all the shared purpose any of them would need to form a group, so giving anything else top billing is a bit odd, but is that what we should really be focusing on? Build it and they will come, even the loonies are welcome if they work productively to stop a global genocide, right? If the thing motivating them is spiritual enlightenment who cares?
I think new age type stuff mostly coalesce around personal belief systems that catch on, like fashion trends. Not all, but many of the ones that gain momentum have a certain logical reasoning to them which provides credibility, and a certain type of thinker gravitates to many of them because they personally excel at abstract thought and therefore find thought experiments mentally stimulating. Many as there are out there, the popular ones persist and expand in much the same way that most branches of philosophy do.
Is that a bad thing? It can be. When an exploitable group-think pattern spawns a cult. That’s when we know, the life cycle of a particular belief system has reached the end of its useful life cycle, right? For better or worse, as the thoughts of the group reaches maturity the debates slow down and some consensus or conclusion or judgment is broadly reached.
So, if you would describe many of the people Hugo picks on as deep thinkers, highly educated, above average intelligent, well spoken, charismatic, etc.. then this is typically the type of thinker that will entertain a new belief system for a while and pick through its elements. It is a relaxing use of grey matter for me, always has been, but I tend to move on after a bit to another one. I don’t get attached. I observe and consider my own experience, frequently taking away some things and discarding the rest.
At the end of the day I am building my own perspective, and that is my goal. It has never been to adopt someone else's all-encompassing dogma. That is a universal error and always done in a vacuum of critical thinking. I am a leader, not a follower, but I respect my betters and feel like I can recognize real wisdom when I encounter it. When I was asked as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up my response was unusual. My answer was "I want to be wise." I do my best, but I know I am not infallible in my own wisdom, and I know the path to wisdom is a careful journey, that it cannot be completed in a sprint and, if one is serious about it, is a journey that stops only when it is rudely interrupted by death.
Is all this new age crap authenticated Lucis Trust cannon? I don’t think he makes the best case for that. He seems to want that to be true and he wants you to see how likely true it is. Circumstantially, the clue is there, but it is not a smoking gun. Its walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck - but it is a goose. And why the Lucis Trust? Why not the Freemasons, or the Jews, or Tavistock, or the lizard people living in the inner earth or on the back side of the moon?
Don't they all have a similar play book?
I have a lot left to play still, but one thing about this argument that jumped out at me right off the bat was the fact that Hugo does not seem to trust ANY of the people he names. He is looking for a connection that, to me, seems very subjective. I think that distrust is understandable, but a bit abnormal. One can defend a bias, but blanket paranoia creates paralysis. Could this be the goal here? That is the real question he raises, and he offers it as a conclusion, but it is just one possibility, and we should maybe table that for now.
I know some of these names are invested in what they are saying and some are getting paid to say it. Everyone is being fleeced, everyone has less to meet their needs, so there is a basic conflict of interest that could explain some innocent behavior.
Peter McCullough is not a good doctor, his beliefs lead him to poor conclusions and he does not appear to me to be interested in changing his beliefs if that means admitting he was wrong. He is one guy I have exchanged emails with. He talked to me, but he brushed me off.
Robert Malone is getting paid, big. He is an originator, a shill and a red herring.
I suspect Carrie Madej started off independent but at some point started to get paid to promote goofy theories. So it appears to me anyhow that she switched teams either due to some threat or out of her own self-interest.
Simone Gold succumbed to the trappings of power and greed. She got a taste of elite money and liked it. AFLDS is a total loss.
Sherry Tenpenny already had a huge organization she constructed around herself pre-covid, and her niche market has not changed that much really. I believe she became useful to the bad guys for that reason and that she is being gently manipulated. Her info is still very good, and I like her style of speaking. It is compelling and inspirational mostly, but also inextricably tangled up in Christian beliefs, which I find distasteful when they become preachy.
I have seen Lee Merritt change her opinions, and her beliefs since this began. She is both smart and wise, and I think she is representative of an powerful independent that has inside knowledge of how the enemy creates and conducts bio-warfare. Her involvement in that is useful to her now. Some people wise up a bit late and she strikes me as one of these people. Of all the people named I would like to talk to her the most.
Reiner Fuellmich cannot possibly be controlled, the effort he made and the quality and sheer volume of the work he has done says, to me anyhow, that he is real, capable, motivated, and genuinely outraged. If he turns out later to be a bad guy in any way I will hang up my detective hat. Because if I cannot find anything wrong with him, should he turn out to be a bad guy, that would reflect on me as being totally incompetent. He did have a career before covid and it involved defending some bankers, but I dismiss this as normal in any successful lawyers career path.
Peter Fleming is a convicted felon, a white collar criminal and not at all any sort of anarchist. He utilizes various systems around him and looks for ways to makes personal gains. I see him as a crafty recidivist with a new angle and most likely an agent getting paid to steer debate at regular intervals.
There are a number of UK personalities I am rather unfamiliar with, so I cannot comment on them and probably won't investigate them much beyond these clips, but Dolores Cahill I do know a lot about. She suffered some serious attacks, both legal and political. She took a major beat down that has stopped a lot of others and had to cope, absorb and regroup, but after regaining her footing she came out hard again. She is, I think, representative of the willful and determined resistance leader.
Given these examples, the people I name provide a range of interests, a spectrum of motivations and as individuals they all represent the range of values I can see ranked as bad guy targets. It is with these examples in mind that I then look at them all as an opposition group, at least in the eyes of an uninformed public. I then begin to think about how an enemy AI would formulate counter moves to subvert their influence as a collective.
I see the bad guys like one giant AI. They are making binary decisions, mostly random, and based on scoring algorithms that are clearly spitting out tactics that have all the hallmarks of machine learning all over them. There has been a pattern of generating fear and panic in sequential campaigns that do not overlap so much that they cannibalize each other's effectiveness.
If you think back over the last twenty or so campaigns, you will notice a pattern in which the least recognized member in the group periodically moves to center stage and the rest follow. What sticks out to me is the fact that they do not really contribute much to each other's discoveries, but they do comment if it gets widespread attention and they feel like their audience expects a comment. But rather than build upon each other's work to broaden the picture they tend to split along party lines, usually with either dissent or agreement, and they almost never self-correct if a particular campaign effort falls flat in terms of impact. The ones that do not comment at all can suffer putting on display their level of commitment to the group in general.
I suspect Carrie Madej started off independent but at some point started to get paid to promote goofy theories. So it appears to me anyhow that she switched teams either due to some threat or out of her own self-interest.
Simone Gold succumbed to the trappings of power and greed. She got a taste of elite money and liked it. AFLDS is a total loss.
Sherry Tenpenny already had a huge organization she constructed around herself pre-covid, and her niche market has not changed that much really. I believe she became useful to the bad guys for that reason and that she is being gently manipulated. Her info is still very good, and I like her style of speaking. It is compelling and inspirational mostly, but also inextricably tangled up in Christian beliefs, which I find distasteful when they become preachy.
I have seen Lee Merritt change her opinions, and her beliefs since this began. She is both smart and wise, and I think she is representative of an powerful independent that has inside knowledge of how the enemy creates and conducts bio-warfare. Her involvement in that is useful to her now. Some people wise up a bit late and she strikes me as one of these people. Of all the people named I would like to talk to her the most.
Reiner Fuellmich cannot possibly be controlled, the effort he made and the quality and sheer volume of the work he has done says, to me anyhow, that he is real, capable, motivated, and genuinely outraged. If he turns out later to be a bad guy in any way I will hang up my detective hat. Because if I cannot find anything wrong with him, should he turn out to be a bad guy, that would reflect on me as being totally incompetent. He did have a career before covid and it involved defending some bankers, but I dismiss this as normal in any successful lawyers career path.
Peter Fleming is a convicted felon, a white collar criminal and not at all any sort of anarchist. He utilizes various systems around him and looks for ways to makes personal gains. I see him as a crafty recidivist with a new angle and most likely an agent getting paid to steer debate at regular intervals.
There are a number of UK personalities I am rather unfamiliar with, so I cannot comment on them and probably won't investigate them much beyond these clips, but Dolores Cahill I do know a lot about. She suffered some serious attacks, both legal and political. She took a major beat down that has stopped a lot of others and had to cope, absorb and regroup, but after regaining her footing she came out hard again. She is, I think, representative of the willful and determined resistance leader.
Given these examples, the people I name provide a range of interests, a spectrum of motivations and as individuals they all represent the range of values I can see ranked as bad guy targets. It is with these examples in mind that I then look at them all as an opposition group, at least in the eyes of an uninformed public. I then begin to think about how an enemy AI would formulate counter moves to subvert their influence as a collective.
I see the bad guys like one giant AI. They are making binary decisions, mostly random, and based on scoring algorithms that are clearly spitting out tactics that have all the hallmarks of machine learning all over them. There has been a pattern of generating fear and panic in sequential campaigns that do not overlap so much that they cannibalize each other's effectiveness.
If you think back over the last twenty or so campaigns, you will notice a pattern in which the least recognized member in the group periodically moves to center stage and the rest follow. What sticks out to me is the fact that they do not really contribute much to each other's discoveries, but they do comment if it gets widespread attention and they feel like their audience expects a comment. But rather than build upon each other's work to broaden the picture they tend to split along party lines, usually with either dissent or agreement, and they almost never self-correct if a particular campaign effort falls flat in terms of impact. The ones that do not comment at all can suffer putting on display their level of commitment to the group in general.
I can see how this behavior makes them appear to behave as compartmentalized cells in a larger organization. If they were controlled they would be waiting their turn. If not, it is has usually been because they have their own legacy campaigns that must run their course, albeit at a lower volume, to maintain their own credibility and relevance and keep their name alive. In marketing this is a strategy called "top of mind". If you cannot be number one you must maintain your market share until you can gain an advantage. Losing market share is slow death, and continuing to compete while losing market share results in diminishing returns up until you ultimately vanish from the playing field.
So that brings us to subversive influence; what the influences are and who is taking the bait, and who might be playing an active role as a bad guy asset. The real assets have operational knowledge beyond their assigned compartment and they tip their hand whenever you see them compete for a bigger role or more valuable compartment. You don't see too many public squabbles. Andrew Kaufmann vs. Judy Mikovits was a rare occurrence, epic good vs. evil. Well, maybe not evil, but clearly good vs. very useful idiot. Kaufman did something similar with a German virologist in one of Reiner's open forums.
That brings us to political affiliations. Let's examine Trump Support:
People are programmed with left/right habits and many are consumed with their search for a savior. Politics provides a great place to cower while in uniform. They "pray" for, and to, anyone with a big mouth, because they have been neutralized. Trump is a total stage monkey and he is DEFINITELY an elite, at least in his own mind. That status is almost entirely defined by net worth, and to a lesser degree, individual Machiavellian talent. This is Trump's strong suit. He is a corrupt guard in the prison complex, not above using his influence to earn and satisfy his own vanity and greed. He is defined by his vanity and hopes wealth on the order of his betters will follow, but his tactics offend those who pay him. Being a Trumper is like wearing a mask or flying the blue and white flag. It is a desperate virtue signal. Trumpers cannot see their own blindness, which is glaring. My mother is like this. Point out any Trump fault or flaw, like the fact that this "hero of the people" is STILL promoting vaccines and you get an instant lecture, at concert volume, like you just called her a whore to her face. I love my mother dearly. She helps me write my books, tells me I am doing God's work every day, extols my virtues and brags to her friends about my talents, but she cannot bring herself to read my blog because it stresses her out, and she votes a straight Republican ticket like a patriotic drone, believing with all her heart she is fighting the good fight. If Trump wins another office as President he will be the ceremonial leader of a dying population sitting atop a toxic dust pile.
Biden Support is based on nothing but Trump hate.
As far as all the causes available to join today I am reminded of some old Steely Dan lyrics:
So that brings us to subversive influence; what the influences are and who is taking the bait, and who might be playing an active role as a bad guy asset. The real assets have operational knowledge beyond their assigned compartment and they tip their hand whenever you see them compete for a bigger role or more valuable compartment. You don't see too many public squabbles. Andrew Kaufmann vs. Judy Mikovits was a rare occurrence, epic good vs. evil. Well, maybe not evil, but clearly good vs. very useful idiot. Kaufman did something similar with a German virologist in one of Reiner's open forums.
That brings us to political affiliations. Let's examine Trump Support:
People are programmed with left/right habits and many are consumed with their search for a savior. Politics provides a great place to cower while in uniform. They "pray" for, and to, anyone with a big mouth, because they have been neutralized. Trump is a total stage monkey and he is DEFINITELY an elite, at least in his own mind. That status is almost entirely defined by net worth, and to a lesser degree, individual Machiavellian talent. This is Trump's strong suit. He is a corrupt guard in the prison complex, not above using his influence to earn and satisfy his own vanity and greed. He is defined by his vanity and hopes wealth on the order of his betters will follow, but his tactics offend those who pay him. Being a Trumper is like wearing a mask or flying the blue and white flag. It is a desperate virtue signal. Trumpers cannot see their own blindness, which is glaring. My mother is like this. Point out any Trump fault or flaw, like the fact that this "hero of the people" is STILL promoting vaccines and you get an instant lecture, at concert volume, like you just called her a whore to her face. I love my mother dearly. She helps me write my books, tells me I am doing God's work every day, extols my virtues and brags to her friends about my talents, but she cannot bring herself to read my blog because it stresses her out, and she votes a straight Republican ticket like a patriotic drone, believing with all her heart she is fighting the good fight. If Trump wins another office as President he will be the ceremonial leader of a dying population sitting atop a toxic dust pile.
Biden Support is based on nothing but Trump hate.
As far as all the causes available to join today I am reminded of some old Steely Dan lyrics:
"Any world that I'm welcomed to…
Is better,
Than the one,
I come from."
Is better,
Than the one,
I come from."
The vote still counts to most people, because they have been Stockholmed by a lifetime of gov't abuse. Biden was elected, or the election was stolen. it doesn’t matter because the criminals run the prison and less will come of voter fraud than did of Obama's qualifications to be a US president. It will be investigated to death but the outcome will compare to the murder investigation of JFK. Trumpers just want Trump back, and if they get him, they are victorious enough. Then there is Biden or Harris. Look at Biden for a single minute, any minute. Look at Harris, or at any state governor for that matter. Look at the Supreme Court members added despite being unable to define "woman". Look at the cartoonish (woman?) Biden named to hear his new "Ministry of Truth". It has to be clear that mindlessness is the most desirable trait in any candidate in the running to hold a high "selected" political office.
Look at the career path, length and voting patterns of everyone in currently holding high office. If it is not completely crystal clear to a person that we have not had any real elections for decades they will never accept it as a possibility before they are dead. It's too extreme, to diminishing, and the weight of their personal responsibility at that point is unbearable. It not their job. The responsibility for correcting this devolution of the country can't possibly fall to them.
It cannot possibly be that far gone. Once the remains cannot be mistaken for the country they remember any longer, if they were tasked with choosing the exact moment it happened the only thing people will feel confident about is their belief that it did not occur in their lifetime, because they were on watch, and saw nothing.
These same crowds instantly came out shrieking about Roe vs. Wade, and the side they choose makes no difference at all. Anyone with an opinion one way or the other will force you to relinquish your life AND your bodily autonomy, and neither side can see the basic conflicts with taking BOTH sides simultaneously. You can't tell a (woman?) she has no rights to her body, but you can tell her to take a deadly vax. As for the pro-life side, it should be a non-issue, because they are all self-sterilizing each other. This is the effect of being paralyzed by cognitive dissonance.
THIS is the objective of the game the bad guys are playing, it is not manufacturing turncoats. That is a lesser role, a movie extra basically, and a cast of extras does not increase the value of any one actor. It is not managing groups of them. All they want is for any group to be incapable of forward progress, to be devoid of momentum, to experience zero growth and debate endlessly.
So take any example Hugo chooses to show active collusion and all I see is controlled chaos with the attentions of the chaotic narrowly focused on the "outrage of the week" to such an extent that they cannot spare enough time to make a single other important decision wisely. They have no bandwidth for the effort required to make two educated, wise decisions at one time, let alone several. And without this ability to multi-task there can be no collective progress. Keeping the number of decisions to exactly one at a time, chosen from a list of the most divisive intractable arguments in history ensures no two decisions anyone manages make will ever be compatible such that it stops the covid/reset bulldozer.
If you want to hear a REALLY good analysis watch this:
THEY WANT YOU TO BE POOR. (Here's why)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LAFlQ7csc8
That is the power of big data in the manufacture of personalized propaganda.
The entire Earth is now a house with only one floor -- a windowless basement.
I see a long game of subversion, distraction, division - it is the chaos upon which the order that will be imposed later will be justified. This is the only game humans collectively all play, and it's been going strong for what, couple thousand years now?
Is it weird that everyone with a similar or complimentary beef associate and organize in some way? No. What else would you expect to see happen? That’s all the World Economic Forum is. It is a simple membership organization, and the members are the elites. Where do people think their money comes from? Annual membership dues range from 60,000 to 600,000, and it is well worth it to those who are members of it.
Are larger protest organizations and events high value targets? Absolutely. Are they attacked in various ways? Sure they are - all the time. Is subversion a good form of attack? It's pretty much always been the best form of attack, because there is never anyone to specifically blame.
Look around. You will see twisted minds everywhere involved in an over-arching twisted goal.
The twisted dream of planning the perfect murder has not lost its allure.
So, is it likely that all these people he names are being herded into a pseudo-religious brain box? Possibly. I mean, they aren't really helping me at all. Apparently my skills are of no use to them. And they are not helping each other, they are just performing for each other. And who among the elite cares where they are herded so long as they go there willingly. There is now a well-placed murder hole in every direction they can possibly move, so any physical or mental landscape is able to function as a good kill box. It is a game of hide and seek played upon an empty two dimensional landscape, and one entire side of the conflict is also blind.
Ironically, not being blind offers me no special advantage on my team, because members of my team can kill with a simple touch. If they cross paths with me it means my death, and like a fool I am shouting out my location to all of them, hoping they will continue to observe social distancing rules.
Everyone with a way to generate income from protesting has that income as a conflict of interest, even me. It is only because I have a benefactor that provides me with free room and board that I can even be who I am right now. Cumulatively, in terms of actual progress, I have contributed more than any ten of these people! But take away my support and the only wise option I can see is to find cover and wait out the holocaust on prison rations. Unless of course I can somehow come up with a way to logically rationalize suicide bombing as a wise choice.
Is it so hard to imagine some of these people are simply trying to not offend those with spacey belief systems if the same people are willing to grant them an assist, or the ego boost of filling a few more sets of ears? I see a pattern of bartering arrangements. I don't see a thriving or even cohesive information ecosystem in all these shared hallucinations and empty gesticulations at the altar of the god of Aquarian utopia.
If you can fix my vax injuries or save the life or restore the health of my vax injured child I would be thrilled if you would be willing to do that for simply wearing your logo on my T-Shirt. That’s just common courtesy, polite manners, and such. Isn't it?
If by some miracle Hugo happens to be wrong, and this group he suspects to be secretly planning our demise somehow manages to overthrow "Team Mephistopheles" as a direct result of some mutually agreed upon new age vision, why would that be bad?
I would wager that the minute Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates spontaneously combust on live television, everyone Hugo names in this new one world religion will immediately deny every instance of them ever mentioning their transition from 3rd density matter into their present 5th dimensional light bodies.
These same crowds instantly came out shrieking about Roe vs. Wade, and the side they choose makes no difference at all. Anyone with an opinion one way or the other will force you to relinquish your life AND your bodily autonomy, and neither side can see the basic conflicts with taking BOTH sides simultaneously. You can't tell a (woman?) she has no rights to her body, but you can tell her to take a deadly vax. As for the pro-life side, it should be a non-issue, because they are all self-sterilizing each other. This is the effect of being paralyzed by cognitive dissonance.
THIS is the objective of the game the bad guys are playing, it is not manufacturing turncoats. That is a lesser role, a movie extra basically, and a cast of extras does not increase the value of any one actor. It is not managing groups of them. All they want is for any group to be incapable of forward progress, to be devoid of momentum, to experience zero growth and debate endlessly.
So take any example Hugo chooses to show active collusion and all I see is controlled chaos with the attentions of the chaotic narrowly focused on the "outrage of the week" to such an extent that they cannot spare enough time to make a single other important decision wisely. They have no bandwidth for the effort required to make two educated, wise decisions at one time, let alone several. And without this ability to multi-task there can be no collective progress. Keeping the number of decisions to exactly one at a time, chosen from a list of the most divisive intractable arguments in history ensures no two decisions anyone manages make will ever be compatible such that it stops the covid/reset bulldozer.
If you want to hear a REALLY good analysis watch this:
THEY WANT YOU TO BE POOR. (Here's why)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LAFlQ7csc8
That is the power of big data in the manufacture of personalized propaganda.
The entire Earth is now a house with only one floor -- a windowless basement.
I see a long game of subversion, distraction, division - it is the chaos upon which the order that will be imposed later will be justified. This is the only game humans collectively all play, and it's been going strong for what, couple thousand years now?
Is it weird that everyone with a similar or complimentary beef associate and organize in some way? No. What else would you expect to see happen? That’s all the World Economic Forum is. It is a simple membership organization, and the members are the elites. Where do people think their money comes from? Annual membership dues range from 60,000 to 600,000, and it is well worth it to those who are members of it.
Are larger protest organizations and events high value targets? Absolutely. Are they attacked in various ways? Sure they are - all the time. Is subversion a good form of attack? It's pretty much always been the best form of attack, because there is never anyone to specifically blame.
Look around. You will see twisted minds everywhere involved in an over-arching twisted goal.
The twisted dream of planning the perfect murder has not lost its allure.
So, is it likely that all these people he names are being herded into a pseudo-religious brain box? Possibly. I mean, they aren't really helping me at all. Apparently my skills are of no use to them. And they are not helping each other, they are just performing for each other. And who among the elite cares where they are herded so long as they go there willingly. There is now a well-placed murder hole in every direction they can possibly move, so any physical or mental landscape is able to function as a good kill box. It is a game of hide and seek played upon an empty two dimensional landscape, and one entire side of the conflict is also blind.
Ironically, not being blind offers me no special advantage on my team, because members of my team can kill with a simple touch. If they cross paths with me it means my death, and like a fool I am shouting out my location to all of them, hoping they will continue to observe social distancing rules.
Everyone with a way to generate income from protesting has that income as a conflict of interest, even me. It is only because I have a benefactor that provides me with free room and board that I can even be who I am right now. Cumulatively, in terms of actual progress, I have contributed more than any ten of these people! But take away my support and the only wise option I can see is to find cover and wait out the holocaust on prison rations. Unless of course I can somehow come up with a way to logically rationalize suicide bombing as a wise choice.
Is it so hard to imagine some of these people are simply trying to not offend those with spacey belief systems if the same people are willing to grant them an assist, or the ego boost of filling a few more sets of ears? I see a pattern of bartering arrangements. I don't see a thriving or even cohesive information ecosystem in all these shared hallucinations and empty gesticulations at the altar of the god of Aquarian utopia.
If you can fix my vax injuries or save the life or restore the health of my vax injured child I would be thrilled if you would be willing to do that for simply wearing your logo on my T-Shirt. That’s just common courtesy, polite manners, and such. Isn't it?
If by some miracle Hugo happens to be wrong, and this group he suspects to be secretly planning our demise somehow manages to overthrow "Team Mephistopheles" as a direct result of some mutually agreed upon new age vision, why would that be bad?
I would wager that the minute Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates spontaneously combust on live television, everyone Hugo names in this new one world religion will immediately deny every instance of them ever mentioning their transition from 3rd density matter into their present 5th dimensional light bodies.
RSS Feed