Here's a great example of why Dr. Mercola drives me crazy…
From Dr. Mercola:
What You Need to Know About Comirnaty
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same
Everything in point #3 is rubbish.
Natural immunity [is all you got] is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, [covid shots offer no immunity whatsoever, they say that in all related vax information] which only provides antibodies [Oh Really? show me those antibodies, then show me how you know that is what they are for] against the SARS-CoV-2 [An imaginary virus that has never been proven to exist with a proper isolation?] spike protein [the effect an imaginary virus that has never been proven to exist] and wanes [Nothing is waning! What is degrading is mRNA STABILITY, and I proved that with the mRNA "vaccine" engineering paper.] within a few [3] months. The shots may [May? WTF Mercola? How much goddamn evidence do you need to see?] in fact permanently limit the kind [ANY KIND] of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with [imaginary] COVID. [a misdirection, since covid is really vax injury!]
What covid shots are doing is giving people HIV, and that was explained by Judy Mikovits who proved the mRNA in these shots is coding for the production of HIVGp120, a gene that causes autoimmune dysfunction.
You see why Mercola pisses me off? He is helping the covid narrative with statements like this and that makes his advice way too similar to the stuff you see coming out of others that are known covid disinformation agents.
I used to follow Mercola and I am on his email list, but I find his opinions, while generally very good, suffer from a form of blindness that afflicts everyone like him, with the exception of only a handful of brilliant people that do not get near enough attention. I became livid when Mercola folded and decided to limit access to his data and medical opinions and I told him so. That’s is why there is no article link to follow, his articles vanish on a timer. That solution was cowardly. I have very strong opinions, I realize that, and I don't mince words, so even I saw some backlash when I scolded him publicly, but the way I look at it the decision he made is that it conveys a belief that his life is somehow more important that mine, and my position is that everyone's life is being threatened equally, so it matters not who you are, they are coming for us all, and they will win if people with Mercola's reach set the wrong example. I will lethally defend my rights, and die if need be, before I submit to so much as a mask order. I was a bit relieved to see that he is attempting to sue Senator Warren, that @#$&%#, because I also have my published works banned, and I wrote the editor that posted that article directly asking if I could somehow become involved in any class action his legal team might bring in the future. I didn't even get so much as an auto reply. I have taken my finding to Reiner Fuellmich and exchanged emails with that legal team and one member of AFLDS, and Pam Popper. In the past they have sent responses, so I am actively trying to raise awareness of certain unique things I know about and have personally uncovered in ways I am able to do. I like Mercola, I do, but I understand the covid operation better than he does, hell, I understand it better than ANYONE I can find online, and believe me, I look everyplace. His lawsuit will wither and die on the vine because the person named in it is sufficiently insulated, so that is all for show. But in terms of Mercola's own opinions on medicine, he stubbornly adheres to faulty assumptions, which makes them useless to me, and it is ONLY for that reason that everything downstream of those assumptions falls short in terms of conclusions he makes, and that affects his approach to it in general. What he has to offer only has so much value as a result. Don't stop reading his material, but also check it against what I am saying and if you do that regularly you will begin to see where he misses the mark. I like to hope that Mercola is just a good man in an evil world.
But, when I see statements like this I start to think Mercola looks a lot like Dr. Peter Fleming, a convicted Medicare fraud felon, currently out there decrying the perils of covid vaccines with misleading fear mongering statements full of truths and half truths that encourage smart people to chase false trails and playing the role of "agent chaos" perfectly. Any lie is better if it contains some truth. Now, I cannot prove Mercola is one of these people, I hate to think he is, but I have fingered others doing this, like Fleming, and caught them red handed. So who knows. These days nothing surprises me, but when you have an audience the size of Mercola's that is always ground zero for most counter intelligence operations and you should expect that is where you find such scams getting their biggest assists. I can't see how you can be as knowledgeable as Mercola is and still believe and promote some of the things he does. So use caution. Incorrect information is not helping anyone.
Disinformation is also power.
There are no examples of covid deaths that do not involve immuno-compromsed people or people with other illnesses. There are no examples of covid deaths in children that are unvaccinated either. There ARE however plenty of covid deaths among covid vaccinated children that involve them also being immuno-compromised.
So whats that suggest?
What's even more illogical is the fact that booster shots are being prioritized for people that are immuno-compromised which makes zero sense, given the FACT that the vaccines are IMMUNO-SURPRESSIVE!
So you tell me, what could possibly be a valid reason for giving anything immuno-supressive to an immuno-compromised person if not to weaken them further and possibly kill them?
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla recently asserted that individuals who spread false information about COVID vaccines are “criminals” who “have literally cost millions of lives.”
Yo, Al... I agree, and I caught one red handed! What do ya wanna do with this example of human garbage over at the Epoch Times?
CDC RECOMMENDS PFZIER AND MODERNA VACCINES
https://m.theepochtimes.com/cdc-vaccine-panel-unanimously-recommends-pfizer-moderna-boosters-for-all-adults_4114238.html?utm_source=CCPVirusNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-11-20
WOW. Too many lies to even count in this. Just breathtaking
From Dr. Mercola:
What You Need to Know About Comirnaty
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label. No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same
- A licensed vaccine is not shielded from liability until or unless it’s added to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule by the CDC. So, if you were injured by Comirnaty, you could sue Pfizer. You cannot sue if injured by the EUA Pfizer shot (or any of the other EUA COVID injections)
- Even though several hundred claims have been filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for injuries resulting from the COVID shots — which is the only possible avenue to obtain damages — not a single claim has been paid out
- Natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wanes within a few months. The shots may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with COVID
- Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the government has done it anyway. Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but the CHD has not given up and is still pursuing the case
Everything in point #3 is rubbish.
Natural immunity [is all you got] is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, [covid shots offer no immunity whatsoever, they say that in all related vax information] which only provides antibodies [Oh Really? show me those antibodies, then show me how you know that is what they are for] against the SARS-CoV-2 [An imaginary virus that has never been proven to exist with a proper isolation?] spike protein [the effect an imaginary virus that has never been proven to exist] and wanes [Nothing is waning! What is degrading is mRNA STABILITY, and I proved that with the mRNA "vaccine" engineering paper.] within a few [3] months. The shots may [May? WTF Mercola? How much goddamn evidence do you need to see?] in fact permanently limit the kind [ANY KIND] of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with [imaginary] COVID. [a misdirection, since covid is really vax injury!]
What covid shots are doing is giving people HIV, and that was explained by Judy Mikovits who proved the mRNA in these shots is coding for the production of HIVGp120, a gene that causes autoimmune dysfunction.
You see why Mercola pisses me off? He is helping the covid narrative with statements like this and that makes his advice way too similar to the stuff you see coming out of others that are known covid disinformation agents.
I used to follow Mercola and I am on his email list, but I find his opinions, while generally very good, suffer from a form of blindness that afflicts everyone like him, with the exception of only a handful of brilliant people that do not get near enough attention. I became livid when Mercola folded and decided to limit access to his data and medical opinions and I told him so. That’s is why there is no article link to follow, his articles vanish on a timer. That solution was cowardly. I have very strong opinions, I realize that, and I don't mince words, so even I saw some backlash when I scolded him publicly, but the way I look at it the decision he made is that it conveys a belief that his life is somehow more important that mine, and my position is that everyone's life is being threatened equally, so it matters not who you are, they are coming for us all, and they will win if people with Mercola's reach set the wrong example. I will lethally defend my rights, and die if need be, before I submit to so much as a mask order. I was a bit relieved to see that he is attempting to sue Senator Warren, that @#$&%#, because I also have my published works banned, and I wrote the editor that posted that article directly asking if I could somehow become involved in any class action his legal team might bring in the future. I didn't even get so much as an auto reply. I have taken my finding to Reiner Fuellmich and exchanged emails with that legal team and one member of AFLDS, and Pam Popper. In the past they have sent responses, so I am actively trying to raise awareness of certain unique things I know about and have personally uncovered in ways I am able to do. I like Mercola, I do, but I understand the covid operation better than he does, hell, I understand it better than ANYONE I can find online, and believe me, I look everyplace. His lawsuit will wither and die on the vine because the person named in it is sufficiently insulated, so that is all for show. But in terms of Mercola's own opinions on medicine, he stubbornly adheres to faulty assumptions, which makes them useless to me, and it is ONLY for that reason that everything downstream of those assumptions falls short in terms of conclusions he makes, and that affects his approach to it in general. What he has to offer only has so much value as a result. Don't stop reading his material, but also check it against what I am saying and if you do that regularly you will begin to see where he misses the mark. I like to hope that Mercola is just a good man in an evil world.
But, when I see statements like this I start to think Mercola looks a lot like Dr. Peter Fleming, a convicted Medicare fraud felon, currently out there decrying the perils of covid vaccines with misleading fear mongering statements full of truths and half truths that encourage smart people to chase false trails and playing the role of "agent chaos" perfectly. Any lie is better if it contains some truth. Now, I cannot prove Mercola is one of these people, I hate to think he is, but I have fingered others doing this, like Fleming, and caught them red handed. So who knows. These days nothing surprises me, but when you have an audience the size of Mercola's that is always ground zero for most counter intelligence operations and you should expect that is where you find such scams getting their biggest assists. I can't see how you can be as knowledgeable as Mercola is and still believe and promote some of the things he does. So use caution. Incorrect information is not helping anyone.
Disinformation is also power.
There are no examples of covid deaths that do not involve immuno-compromsed people or people with other illnesses. There are no examples of covid deaths in children that are unvaccinated either. There ARE however plenty of covid deaths among covid vaccinated children that involve them also being immuno-compromised.
So whats that suggest?
What's even more illogical is the fact that booster shots are being prioritized for people that are immuno-compromised which makes zero sense, given the FACT that the vaccines are IMMUNO-SURPRESSIVE!
So you tell me, what could possibly be a valid reason for giving anything immuno-supressive to an immuno-compromised person if not to weaken them further and possibly kill them?
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla recently asserted that individuals who spread false information about COVID vaccines are “criminals” who “have literally cost millions of lives.”
Yo, Al... I agree, and I caught one red handed! What do ya wanna do with this example of human garbage over at the Epoch Times?
CDC RECOMMENDS PFZIER AND MODERNA VACCINES
https://m.theepochtimes.com/cdc-vaccine-panel-unanimously-recommends-pfizer-moderna-boosters-for-all-adults_4114238.html?utm_source=CCPVirusNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-11-20
WOW. Too many lies to even count in this. Just breathtaking
RSS Feed