First imagine the most evil character you can, a person hopelessly devoid of any redeeming qualities. A completely lost soul, incapable of empathy, and for whom there is no possible path back to anything resembling humanity.
Now imagine the kind of thing that would give such a character wet dreams.
Most people cannot come close to what this might include. What I want you to think about, is what would happen if a person like this devised a way to acquire capabilities that could give him practically unlimited power and control over others. A power he would be inescapably compelled to utilize. Capabilities that would enable him to mangle the entire civilized world, to flog it, mercilessly, into a form he would truly enjoy.
What I am telling you,
is that there are many of them.
And if we allow them to succeed, by continuing to underestimate their abilities as we have been doing all this time, justifying our tolerance of the intolerable by thinking such a plan must surely be impossible, they will, very soon, with the just the flip of a switch, take most everything they want from anyone that has it.
They have the means now, to be invincible. Just a few more moves left in this game before the big shocking realization that that we are trapped and cannot escape, that will move us all past a point of no return.
Please do not scoff at this. I have mountains of proof this is real. Help me drag this operation, and them, into the light of day, and stop this runaway train.
BRAIN SCIENCE FROM BENCH TO BATTLEFIELD:
THE REALITIES AND RISKS OF NEUROWEAPONS | CGSR SEMINAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUtQbriWt64
This is a 2017 presentation by James Giordano at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s Center for Global Security Research (CGSR). He elaborates on how neuroscience can be weaponized and used in warfare.
Meet "Slipping Jimmy" Giordano.
This guy is a classic example of what a hyper-Machiavellian, pathological lying psychopath looks like…
The first lie he told was in his opening remarks, where he began by gently chastising YOU for what he internally views as childish over reactions, before feigning what I think is the worst ever impression of a guy trying way too hard to sell you his custom personality cloak of self-effacing humility, by reminding you, reassuringly, not to worry, because: "We don't know what makes you, you". After which, he then goes on at great length and excruciating detail, explaining exactly how he can make you into anything he wants to for the next hour, adding that this currently viable form of brain hacking that he is so proud of is not only out of the beta stage, not only lethally effective, but that it is:
"without a doubt, actively deployed and in use today, everywhere, internationally".
You see, "Slipping Jimmy" Giordano chose that opener with ice-cold, calculated care, for its manipulative utility, and delivered his lines as all high functioning psychopaths stereotypically do, but he also simultaneously demonstrated how acute psychopathy presents itself with an irresistible display of high stakes gambling behavior.
What's the bet?
He is wagering that nobody will notice it is this very capability he is there to explain which makes his first statement the lie that it is.
In other words, it doesn’t matter what you were before he fucks with you, using all this torture tech he loves to create for the torturers that pay him to figure out the nuts and bolts of how to do it, because nobody cutting the paychecks that fund this shop of horrors ever placed any value on that whatsoever.
It's what kind of "you" they can force you to be that matters here, confirming the thing I always say that should never be forgotten, no matter what the area of research is:
"Once a thing can be utilized as a weapon, that is the only thing it will ever be"
This man should be jailed immediately, but preferably shot dead.
As you listen to his lecture, pay particular attention to "Slippin Jimmy" Giordano's content (not his presentation of it) He is a textbook example of a high functioning psychopath. Work backwards from his material and you will discover, as I did, that doing so will massively reduce a huge pile of research bulk into a manageable list of key bullet points.
Then go back to whatever you have collected yourself and evaluate it for relevance, and to see if any of the random puzzle pieces you think are important intersects solidly with it and your focus will be where you need to be. The tenants of apophatic inquiry should guide your critical thinking, not the presence of any presenter.
Giordano's character flaws make him a weak link. Use that. And use HIM. He did me a huge service by summarizing the mountain of documentation that was paralyzing me. He did the work I was struggling to do, and did a masterful job of it. I could make a similarly brilliant presentation of my own simply by pressing the pause button frequently, and talking over him, and I may in fact do exactly that.
Read between his lines. Understand that his true role in this is organizational, that he is the prize "pitchman", and you will then have the biggest picture there currently is.
When you are trying to place a value on some piece of information you must first figure out where that puzzle piece fits. If there is "no clear fit" what you have is something of low importance, a misdirection, false narrative, diversion, time suck, etc. Some fringe things fit, but many don't. Some things you may be spending way too much time on are simply failed explorations, mental floss, or suppressive fire.
Remember: A PhD is an inch wide and a mile deep. You don't need to be one to understand this. In fact, its better to be an inch deep and a mile wide.
But to effectively explain it to others, you need to be 50 miles wide, and ferry people across this trench by honing your own ability to pole vault over craters of disinformation like a ninja, without looking down, or backwards. Some rabbit holes need to be back filled with cement.
Over explaining, over citing, obsessing on supporting documentation… everything good researchers do when they prepare a lecture, in this case, will ruin your case delivery, because it leads to intractable debates that serve a very real operational intelligence security function. Those debates (i.e virus/no virus, medical literature, environment, economics, politics, ethics, healthcare for all, biosecurity, et.al.) are intentionally placed obstacles designed to thwart or derail the efforts of anyone trying to expose the real agenda, the vision, the motivation, ultimately, the end points of it all.
They are distractions that you should recognize, and rightfully treat, as the armor plating around the core operation.
Mousey protests and activism that results in activists being satisfied when they hear people asking the right questions is completely ineffective.
Don’t question. ACCUSE! There is more than enough evidence.
In other words, what distinguishes a "truth warrior" from a "truth WAR-LORD" is this:
The war-lord never wastes time trying to make dents in this armor when planning his attack strategy against such an elite and overly prepared class of criminals.
The War-Lord's goal is penetration.
For those of you who are awake,
my hope is that it will make you mad enough to take some decisive actions.
PSYCHOPATH KLAUS SCHWAB HAS A WARNING TO THE WORLD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Fx2DGjeMLizW/
So here we have a quick recap of something "Col. Klinck" tipped us off to a while back: "The covid-19 crisis would be seen as a small disturbance compared to a comprehensive cyber attack."
You might think you know what he's talking about. Back when he said this I thought I did, but considering what I have learned since then, today I look at this a bit differently, and I would encourage you to do the same.
Back then, given the overbearing "Russian Man Bad" narrative they were pushing, we were all encouraged to believe what he was referring to was a Putin-inspired hack attack on the power grid, or the internet, or both, and that our reliance on these things would be the end of us all were they ever disabled. They even gave this a name if you recall: "cyberpolygon".
However that was all before myself and others let the Bio-Nano Electronic Warfare cat out of the bag.
You have to always remember that while these psychopaths love to telegraph their moves and laugh behind closed doors about how we are all so stupid that they can openly disclose their intentions and it will go right over our heads, they also relish tricking us with misdirections. They want us looking away while they skulk about in other areas and advance different aspects of multiple coordinated agendas.
What I now think our favorite Nazi is referring to is a biological cyber attack. It makes sense, doesn't it? Now that you are starting to become aware of all the things they have been doing under the guise of diagnostic medical devices that are supposed to save us all from the next covid-esque surprise, all this time they have been doping us all with graphene vaccines, medical injectables, foods, etc.
The ultimate control they hope to obtain over the populations of the world has always been a thing they intended to exercise covertly, with synthetic biological nanotech, and they have managed to do this right under our noses. While everyone was duly aware of being chipped, we were expecting actual chips, and only the most stupid people were opting into that idea as a novel way to buy a latte or open a door.
When you consider what is now possible to do to a person that has become vulnerable to the weapons of under-the-skin bioterrorism, the scamdemic probably would seem like a small disturbance in comparison to electronically causing that sudden death syndrome everyplace in everyone they consider to be expendable.
Depopulation? Mission easily accomplished.
Sound Sleepers Suck
If I had to summarize the level of psychological maturity that characterizes sleepers; the truth is that these people we are surrounded by are children, capricious brats terrified of disobeying "authority" figures, who feel they would lose everything, such as their "self-esteem" (which they clearly don't have) if they tried to do so.
This is my point. There are very, very few true adults around. People don't really want to grow up because they have not had to. They are technically considered to be adults, but they are are actually selfish children with practical experience, and the system we all live in is a playground/cage for these children, where functional game rules are imposed in such a way that "validations" from "authoritative" figures have to be competitively fought for without scruples.
I believe that the problem stems not only from their level of education, (more aptly described as their level of indoctrination), or cognitive sophistication, but can also be due to the level of awareness and courage that someone has, or believes they have.
The system is founded on encouraging support of everything except those valued maxims that would bring it to its knees, namely truth and justice. The system works in such a way as to make it inconvenient, even repulsive, to integrate these characteristics into oneself.
Selfish "adult" children are raised to value lying, and to believe in "mors tua vita mea" (A Latin expression that means "Your death, my life".) It is considered the law of the jungle, and is used in competitions where only one winner can be chosen.) If we consider the phenomenon of feral children, we can see the degree of (persistent) mental conditioning to which human beings can be subjected, which then becomes the limit of one's horizons.
We are dealing with a mass of selfish, capricious, evil little shit kids, who all have one over-arching character flaw in common -- Cowardice.
Our ruling class are another thing entirely, and the best descriptive term I can think of to embody their collective behaviors is Self Absorbed Predation: A complete focus on oneself to the exclusion of the rights and liberties, and in fact, the very personhood, of those around them.
To be so self-absorbed is to embody an unhealthy mix of the dark triad of traits: Narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, and such individuals do not see other people as an end, but as a means, meaning they see others as mere objects to be used, rather than subjects to be connected with. They need not concern themselves with any sort of obligatory stewardship roles, for those they consider beneath them neither deserve nor demand basic human dignity.
Who are "They"?
To answer that question I will, once again, strongly recommend you take this clip in, frequently, to help you see "them" more clearly:
Dr.SHIVA™: SHATTER THE SWARM. How The Few Control the Many.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEkgZtu_Q2Q
This is a BRILLIANT 15 minute whiteboard presentation that explains the hidden hand that is so hard for people to see by explaining its organizational structure.
Its not a pyramid or club, it is a self-reinforcing swarm. I am not promoting anything but this presentation, you cannot miss the message. Even normies get it super quick. It's an A-HA experience for everyone that is way more powerful even than Jones Plantation.
I have one more brutally blunt, but perfect answer, to a very hard question.
JJ COUEY EXPLAINS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION BEHAVIOR
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bbuvc9LL181M/
Please listen to Jonathan Jay Couey, PhD explain the behavior of people who you see talking all the time, faux activists that carefully avoid certain topics, earning the suspicion those of us with a superior degree of awareness have about them; the people we notice that are curiously just as shifty as they are believable, that we accuse of being agents of "controlled opposition". This is a long roster of names that is sure to include people you follow, and possibly even some you foolishly trust.