I realize most of my readers are expecting the next installment of "Exposing the Bio-API". It's coming. I expected to have that done by now, but after posting part four I also began reading some of the other documentation I have been collecting, and there is a lot of that. Part of the reason has to do with making sure I do not make any mistakes as I decode the language used in that systematic review paper the series is based on, but also because I have found a few more recent papers, so I am trying to confirm what might sound like forward looking predictions I sometimes make about statements in a two year old document.
My intent is to tell you where I KNOW their plan is going, not to speculate generally on where I think it can go. But it really does not matter if I am a palm reader or the Oracle of Delphi, because if I can think of an evil use, you can bet your last dime they most certainly can as well, and typically, everything that is possible to do eventually does become part of this system as an additional capability.
Most "normies" scoff at the entire concept, thinking it to be too far out to believe, you just can't convince them, (no clue why) that with enough of an army working on a thing, the "impossible" frequently becomes possible faster than the same people realize. It sucks to know this kind of stuff.
Because nobody really wants, or welcomes, an idea taking up residence in their head like; "I am the bio weapon."
But I won't convince anyone that’s even possible without solid proof. I have to have that, because its going to be far too easy to dismiss me personally. The reasons people come up with are endless, because this stuff is so ugly.
My intent is to tell you where I KNOW their plan is going, not to speculate generally on where I think it can go. But it really does not matter if I am a palm reader or the Oracle of Delphi, because if I can think of an evil use, you can bet your last dime they most certainly can as well, and typically, everything that is possible to do eventually does become part of this system as an additional capability.
Most "normies" scoff at the entire concept, thinking it to be too far out to believe, you just can't convince them, (no clue why) that with enough of an army working on a thing, the "impossible" frequently becomes possible faster than the same people realize. It sucks to know this kind of stuff.
Because nobody really wants, or welcomes, an idea taking up residence in their head like; "I am the bio weapon."
But I won't convince anyone that’s even possible without solid proof. I have to have that, because its going to be far too easy to dismiss me personally. The reasons people come up with are endless, because this stuff is so ugly.
I'm Sorry. It Is TRUE. You ARE!
And Here Is All The Proof You Need.
And Here Is All The Proof You Need.
source: American Journal of Bioinformatics Research 2021, 11(1): 1-31
DOI: 10.5923/j.bioinformatics.20211101.0
DOI: 10.5923/j.bioinformatics.20211101.0
Even I don't want it to be true, and please believe me when I tell you that. I tried very hard to find a reason to dismiss this paper myself. As I read through this I thought of plenty of reasons too, but before I share them, please download and read this document yourself by clicking here:
My first thought was it was a fake journal paper. I read a lot of peer reviewed literature, even stuff currently under review. One thing you notice about good research is you rarely see authors submit a paper they care about without having someone proofread it for typos, grammar, proper formatting, etc. This paper is badly written, so I saw a red flag there.
It is full of broken English, typos, the same text appears repeatedly in different sections. Its like someone assembled it by clipping paragraphs from multiple other sources and hastily assembled this thing. So immediately I suspected maybe the journal wasn’t real, or wasn't credible, or maybe the document number was fake, or the authors were not credible experts, or real people I could look up, so I began vetting all of that. Here's what I found:
The journal is a real journal. It appears to be legit and venerable, but even with the most respected journals, like JAMA, there is always a possibility of some kind of "pay to publish" thing going on. We saw that over and over again during the pandemic scare. If anyone knows of anything like that going on with this one please tell me. I don't see any of that.
Authors are credited in the order of their contribution to the paper so the first guy named is the biggest contributor. Whenever you see a lot of authors on a thing the last guy named had the least to do with it. He may even be a student whose only involvement was to help out in some way. Everyone in academia wants to be published, it’s a big deal to them. Sometimes people are named as a professional courtesy or favor.
This paper has 13 authors, which is a lot, but I looked them all up. The first five listed are important and have very well established careers. The rest less so, but together, if you look at what all their current jobs are, this adds a lot of credibility to the information provided. You see experts in all the right places. It appears the thing that connects them all is some time spent in connection with Northwestern University in Bangladesh. Looking at the top five we have;
It is full of broken English, typos, the same text appears repeatedly in different sections. Its like someone assembled it by clipping paragraphs from multiple other sources and hastily assembled this thing. So immediately I suspected maybe the journal wasn’t real, or wasn't credible, or maybe the document number was fake, or the authors were not credible experts, or real people I could look up, so I began vetting all of that. Here's what I found:
The journal is a real journal. It appears to be legit and venerable, but even with the most respected journals, like JAMA, there is always a possibility of some kind of "pay to publish" thing going on. We saw that over and over again during the pandemic scare. If anyone knows of anything like that going on with this one please tell me. I don't see any of that.
- The paper is real.
- The document number is authentic.
- It is actually in this journal.
- It is currently behind a pay wall and the cost to get it is $299.00
- The authors are real and I looked them all up.
- Most of them have published other related papers so they are publishing within their field of expertise.
- They all appear to be alive, with active profiles and resumes and they appear to be who they purport to be.
Authors are credited in the order of their contribution to the paper so the first guy named is the biggest contributor. Whenever you see a lot of authors on a thing the last guy named had the least to do with it. He may even be a student whose only involvement was to help out in some way. Everyone in academia wants to be published, it’s a big deal to them. Sometimes people are named as a professional courtesy or favor.
This paper has 13 authors, which is a lot, but I looked them all up. The first five listed are important and have very well established careers. The rest less so, but together, if you look at what all their current jobs are, this adds a lot of credibility to the information provided. You see experts in all the right places. It appears the thing that connects them all is some time spent in connection with Northwestern University in Bangladesh. Looking at the top five we have;
Md. Rahimulla Miah
https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1376147/overview
Department of Information Technology in Health and Research Associate, Northeast Medical Pvt. Limited, Sylhet, Bangladesh and Former PhD Student, IBEC, University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia Expert of sensor technology in health with 20 years of career experience in teaching on bio-sensor networks and informatics. North East Medical College Sylhet, Bangladesh
AAM Sahzzadur Rahman
https://search.brave.com/search?q=AAM+Shazzadur+Rahman&source=desktop
Department of Medicine, Northeast Medical College, Sylhet, Bangladesh
Associate Professor of Medicine - Cited by 160 - Clinical Medicine - Tropical and Infectious diseases
Md. Shahariar Khan
https://www.nemc.edu.bd/our_team/dr-md-shahariar-khan-2/
Assistant Professor Paediatric Cardiology Northeast Medical College
Impact of Sensor Networks towards Individuals Augmenting Causes of Diabetes.
Journal of Endocrinology Research, 3(1), 1-20. 2021
Processed Radio Frequency towards Pancreas Enhancing the Deadly Diabetes Worldwide.
Journal of Endocrinology Research, 3(1), 1-20. 2021
Mohammed Abdul Hannan
https://scholar.google.com.sg/citations?user=H1aGKLQAAAAJ&hl=en
Lecturer at University of British Columbia, Adjunct Faculty at Newcastle University
Verified email at mail.ubc.ca
Neural network based prediction of stable equivalent series resistance in voltage regulator characterization
MHM Zaman, MM Mustafa, MA Hannan, A Hussain
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 7 (1), 134-142
Md. Sabbir Hossain
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-2056
B.Sc in Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering)
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute: Dhaka, BD
2013-12-01 to present | Biotechnologist (Basic and Applied Research on Jute)
So why is this paper so messy? There has to be a reason for it, but I can only speculate about what it is so I won't waste tons of time doing that. I just can't help but wonder if maybe it was presented this way deliberately, in a way that would not attract the same attention as a properly written paper, but just to get something out there on the record, like a shrewd whistleblower might do.
I realize that works both ways and you see it done with propaganda as well, but the important thing here is the information. Propaganda is easy to spot. It hangs out there unsupportable by anything other than similar propaganda. That’s not what this is. Everything in this paper fits with everything else I have seen and read, it was just shocking to me, to see anyone speak so plainly and bluntly, and also to hear that from a guy who actually understands and actively works as a teacher in this field. I believe Rahimulla Miah at least, figured out what's really going on and he is, understandably, really freaked out about it.
I have been known to say repeatedly in the past that fear has many uses. I have told people not to believe everything the enemy would have you believe, and not to fear the enemy because you think him to be invincible or because he claims to have something so scary at his disposal that all is lost.
The enemy knows that your fear of what he may have has just as much utility in war what he does have.
An example that proves this is the current state of public debate about what the vaccines are potentially doing to human genetics. I hear learned people sounding alarms constantly about vaccines causing irreversible genetic damage that is existentially dooming us all.
I don't subscribe to that idea, nor do I even think such a thing is even possible. Nature always prevails and finds a way forward. The people funding and coordinating all the research being done in nano-biotech believe human science has surpassed their creator, and that they have embarrassed him with their creativity. They won't put it in those terms exactly, but regardless of whether or not they realize this or state it explicitly, it is what they believe.
I realize that works both ways and you see it done with propaganda as well, but the important thing here is the information. Propaganda is easy to spot. It hangs out there unsupportable by anything other than similar propaganda. That’s not what this is. Everything in this paper fits with everything else I have seen and read, it was just shocking to me, to see anyone speak so plainly and bluntly, and also to hear that from a guy who actually understands and actively works as a teacher in this field. I believe Rahimulla Miah at least, figured out what's really going on and he is, understandably, really freaked out about it.
I have been known to say repeatedly in the past that fear has many uses. I have told people not to believe everything the enemy would have you believe, and not to fear the enemy because you think him to be invincible or because he claims to have something so scary at his disposal that all is lost.
The enemy knows that your fear of what he may have has just as much utility in war what he does have.
An example that proves this is the current state of public debate about what the vaccines are potentially doing to human genetics. I hear learned people sounding alarms constantly about vaccines causing irreversible genetic damage that is existentially dooming us all.
I don't subscribe to that idea, nor do I even think such a thing is even possible. Nature always prevails and finds a way forward. The people funding and coordinating all the research being done in nano-biotech believe human science has surpassed their creator, and that they have embarrassed him with their creativity. They won't put it in those terms exactly, but regardless of whether or not they realize this or state it explicitly, it is what they believe.
The existence of weaponized bio-nano technology is NOT a bluff.
They have it.
Much of what they claim they can do with it is NOT a bluff.
I tend not to concern myself as much with finding where
the actual line is between truth and fiction,
because the capabilities they have already demonstrated they have
are horrifying enough.
Their willingness to actually use it is NOT a bluff.
I can produce example after example of them using it.
They have it.
Much of what they claim they can do with it is NOT a bluff.
I tend not to concern myself as much with finding where
the actual line is between truth and fiction,
because the capabilities they have already demonstrated they have
are horrifying enough.
Their willingness to actually use it is NOT a bluff.
I can produce example after example of them using it.
I know what they hope to achieve with this, and I can see a way to do that, but I also see plenty of ways we can disrupt the timeline they are on. As with any complex plan, this one is being done in stages. The only way this plan of theirs works is if each major contributory objective succeeds on schedule and without a hitch, but pulling off something of this magnitude is a tall order, even for them. I have to believe we can foul that up, or I may as well kill myself now.
I don't know about you, but suicide is NOT how I roll. If you feel like me, BE LIKE ME, because I need your help. One guy shouting from a rooftop isn't going to be enough to derail this. No matter how outrageous this plan looks to you, don't underestimate these people. Winning is not a matter of resources, it is a matter of numbers. If we lose the one advantage we have, they win.
I realize material like this is a LOT to swallow, but man up and believe in your ability to understand it no matter how far over your head it first appears to be. Like it or not, accept it or not, believe it or not; you do have skin in the game here.
The pandemic crisis was the culmination of an immensely ambitious plan and it was the first time many of us began to realize that it was big enough to affect every living person on Earth. The simple truth is that an impossibly narcissistic, over-the-top psychotic goal has been in motion for over a hundred years, and the bad guys are still trying to keep you guessing about what that is.
They have been pretty good at that thus far, I have to admit. And they have been using all kinds of other smaller contributory agendas that serve different functions to keep us all off balance and looking the wrong way as each one we take our eye off of advances, inexorably ahead. Each one has a proper place on the grand strategy board. Some agendas function as building blocks, others are preparatory steps, some are promotional or preemptive strategies.
We all want to know what to do, but knowing what the right move is requires being able to see enough of the chessboard that you can choose to occupy a space AHEAD of where they are at any given time on the master timeline. I think about this by assuming the best version of the enemies mindset I can muster and I try my best to maintain that when making my own decisions.
I put on my "Dr. Evil hat" and ask myself questions like: What would it be necessary to do to ensure that I was always advancing that master plan? How would I keep pivoting as people get wise to one thing after another? I look to history for possibilities since there is a clear pattern I can always see repeating. These guys are not all that smart, and they never deviate from the usual boiler plate cons. They just dress them up differently.
I now see what I believe is the master plan. I have felt certain of this before and been wrong. We all have. But this time I really doubt there is anything bigger than installing everyone on Earth with nefarious wetware. I can establish a pretty firm date as to when this scheme was hatched, which was 1922.
There were a bunch of scientific discoveries that happened in the early 1920's that seeded the bio-nanotech pipe dream. That’s a long time in the making, but also about the time they had just wrapped up the last big global glitter bomb and were looking for some way to top a series of events they had just cemented into motion that would begin with the stock market crash of 1929 and end with WWII.
It was obvious this effort would require a lot of manpower, but also a tremendous amount of money to pay all the people they would need to bring this into reality. So they siphoned and stole that money from everywhere imaginable, right down to the change in your couch cushions before they simply began printing cash wholesale.
The only other priority while this was going on would be to earmark some of that capital to misdirect everyone making a career in the hard sciences by funding impossible bullshit, so none of them could progress in any area that could, or would, interfere with this plan.
(Today that effort has created new AI problems to overcome that may never be possible to control, not that it is of any importance to them to do so given the over-arching depopulation motives they have.)
The nuts and bolts were all fleshed out in compartments they created simultaneously along the way. These functioned as silos of intelligence that would provide all the puzzle pieces for the "remotely controlled slave race" they believed was possible to engineer, and they quashed anyone that proved anything "inconvenient" if they were outside of these strictly controlled niche pursuits.
Before this, the field of medicine had very little in common with computer science and cyber security. There is very little crossover beyond the obvious. They even cite this as a current obstacle to further progress on aligning AI with good patient care, lamenting the lack of interdisciplinary human capital available for hire. They even whine in these policy documents I have about doctors and computer wonks being socially incompatible! Today this same separation works in their favor, because the doctors never think to look for any answers in the server rooms the hackers dwell in.
Over the next hundred years, Big Pharma created enough sickness to provide the excuse they needed to earn and burn mountains of cash making the kinds of covert advances in synthetic biology that they would need and justified that work in the usual manner; "for your benefit".
Computing power, databases, and internet capabilities grew until the basic requirements needed for IoBNT were met. Combining IoBNT with wireless tech, which they pushed until it became the fashion crazed addiction it is today, resulted in a new threat being born. We need some new terms to distinguish these threats from the ones they use in their propaganda. The new danger is NOT synthetic viruses created and leaked from bioweapons laboratories. We need to call this what it is.
The new threat is coming from weaponized "electronic pathogens".
The gross architecture provided by wireless cellular networks gave them their first real capabilities, which they began to salivate over in 1995. By 2005 they were actively testing on humans. Their early successes emboldened them even more. Seeing this as a return on their investment the next question was:
They have been pretty good at that thus far, I have to admit. And they have been using all kinds of other smaller contributory agendas that serve different functions to keep us all off balance and looking the wrong way as each one we take our eye off of advances, inexorably ahead. Each one has a proper place on the grand strategy board. Some agendas function as building blocks, others are preparatory steps, some are promotional or preemptive strategies.
We all want to know what to do, but knowing what the right move is requires being able to see enough of the chessboard that you can choose to occupy a space AHEAD of where they are at any given time on the master timeline. I think about this by assuming the best version of the enemies mindset I can muster and I try my best to maintain that when making my own decisions.
I put on my "Dr. Evil hat" and ask myself questions like: What would it be necessary to do to ensure that I was always advancing that master plan? How would I keep pivoting as people get wise to one thing after another? I look to history for possibilities since there is a clear pattern I can always see repeating. These guys are not all that smart, and they never deviate from the usual boiler plate cons. They just dress them up differently.
I now see what I believe is the master plan. I have felt certain of this before and been wrong. We all have. But this time I really doubt there is anything bigger than installing everyone on Earth with nefarious wetware. I can establish a pretty firm date as to when this scheme was hatched, which was 1922.
There were a bunch of scientific discoveries that happened in the early 1920's that seeded the bio-nanotech pipe dream. That’s a long time in the making, but also about the time they had just wrapped up the last big global glitter bomb and were looking for some way to top a series of events they had just cemented into motion that would begin with the stock market crash of 1929 and end with WWII.
It was obvious this effort would require a lot of manpower, but also a tremendous amount of money to pay all the people they would need to bring this into reality. So they siphoned and stole that money from everywhere imaginable, right down to the change in your couch cushions before they simply began printing cash wholesale.
The only other priority while this was going on would be to earmark some of that capital to misdirect everyone making a career in the hard sciences by funding impossible bullshit, so none of them could progress in any area that could, or would, interfere with this plan.
(Today that effort has created new AI problems to overcome that may never be possible to control, not that it is of any importance to them to do so given the over-arching depopulation motives they have.)
The nuts and bolts were all fleshed out in compartments they created simultaneously along the way. These functioned as silos of intelligence that would provide all the puzzle pieces for the "remotely controlled slave race" they believed was possible to engineer, and they quashed anyone that proved anything "inconvenient" if they were outside of these strictly controlled niche pursuits.
Before this, the field of medicine had very little in common with computer science and cyber security. There is very little crossover beyond the obvious. They even cite this as a current obstacle to further progress on aligning AI with good patient care, lamenting the lack of interdisciplinary human capital available for hire. They even whine in these policy documents I have about doctors and computer wonks being socially incompatible! Today this same separation works in their favor, because the doctors never think to look for any answers in the server rooms the hackers dwell in.
Over the next hundred years, Big Pharma created enough sickness to provide the excuse they needed to earn and burn mountains of cash making the kinds of covert advances in synthetic biology that they would need and justified that work in the usual manner; "for your benefit".
Computing power, databases, and internet capabilities grew until the basic requirements needed for IoBNT were met. Combining IoBNT with wireless tech, which they pushed until it became the fashion crazed addiction it is today, resulted in a new threat being born. We need some new terms to distinguish these threats from the ones they use in their propaganda. The new danger is NOT synthetic viruses created and leaked from bioweapons laboratories. We need to call this what it is.
The new threat is coming from weaponized "electronic pathogens".
The gross architecture provided by wireless cellular networks gave them their first real capabilities, which they began to salivate over in 1995. By 2005 they were actively testing on humans. Their early successes emboldened them even more. Seeing this as a return on their investment the next question was:
By 2012 these experiments began to scale up to include entire populations through the use of geoengineering programs and controlled mass food production, and we saw this when GMO's first appeared. Only nobody knew then, or even now, that those early forays into how one creates GMO plants were the entry point for nanotech to begin poisoning the entire food chain.
All during the last century, as time passed, they financed as much fake literature as they could write that encouraged a superstitious belief in vaccines, [again] and they normalized that. This is why the work of Louis Pasteur had to be medical cannon, and why the work of Antoine Bechamp and Charles Richet had to be forgotten. My first book was crushed out for this reason. It was all about Charles Richet and what he taught us pulled the rug out right out from under vaccine proponents. Believe me, it was getting looked at very seriously by way too many people globally, and that hurt the plan and could not be allowed.
That was my first clue, and the thing that kicked off everything I would eventually do afterwards.
Then, in 2020, we had the full blown pandemic hoax, the holy covid water, and everything that followed. Big move. Successful move. My second book probably helped their plan, because it included a vax injury protocol I created that was based on their shit literature that they knew would not work, so they let me run with that one. Why not, right? Eventually the same advice would even be parroted by credentialed doctors and nobody called them on it. Nobody but me. Because I tested that advice myself. When it didn't work I found where I went wrong and eventually came up with something better, something I then proved worked. But, unsurprisingly, that is something I can't convince any credentialed doctors to take seriously.
And now that I have been doing this deep dive into the research and development timeline of IoNT, which became IoBNT , everything is coming together to form a very clear picture.
All during the last century, as time passed, they financed as much fake literature as they could write that encouraged a superstitious belief in vaccines, [again] and they normalized that. This is why the work of Louis Pasteur had to be medical cannon, and why the work of Antoine Bechamp and Charles Richet had to be forgotten. My first book was crushed out for this reason. It was all about Charles Richet and what he taught us pulled the rug out right out from under vaccine proponents. Believe me, it was getting looked at very seriously by way too many people globally, and that hurt the plan and could not be allowed.
That was my first clue, and the thing that kicked off everything I would eventually do afterwards.
Then, in 2020, we had the full blown pandemic hoax, the holy covid water, and everything that followed. Big move. Successful move. My second book probably helped their plan, because it included a vax injury protocol I created that was based on their shit literature that they knew would not work, so they let me run with that one. Why not, right? Eventually the same advice would even be parroted by credentialed doctors and nobody called them on it. Nobody but me. Because I tested that advice myself. When it didn't work I found where I went wrong and eventually came up with something better, something I then proved worked. But, unsurprisingly, that is something I can't convince any credentialed doctors to take seriously.
And now that I have been doing this deep dive into the research and development timeline of IoNT, which became IoBNT , everything is coming together to form a very clear picture.
 |  |
You see, with the decision to force-inject everyone with what they knew would cause massive death, because the method of transhumanizing people is toxic to them. By ignoring that they created a problem that they knew would start a clock ticking, and they knew how long they had and approximately when it would run out. Vaccines could be marketed to people like a gift from God for a short time, but only until huge numbers of vaccine injury victims began meeting God in person in greater numbers than they could hide.
Somebody wisely foresaw that vaccine "hesitancy" was bound to turn into vaccine "hell no", so they knew damn well they could never actually vaccinate everyone, and before they hit this wall they would need to have lots of other ways to dose people without their knowledge standing by, ready and waiting. They know mainlining this poison is the next best thing to a nasopharyngeal administration vector, so adulterating medical injectables, annual flu shots and covid tests were a no-brainer but, to get everyone they would need to poison them every possible way there was to do that, so no matter where a person went or whatever they did, they were completely surrounded by traps, and almost everything on the planet being manufactured by their own "stakeholders" it was so easy to do that they simply poisoned everything with nano graphene!
They have by now, most certainly managed to nano-install every last person they could in some way. Nobody can really tell you what is safe and what's is not anymore. It’s a total crapshoot.
If you ate food, it would be full of nanotech, if you drank any water from the secondary water supply, it would be poisoned with nanotech. If you if you lived in the wilderness smart dust would rain down on you. If you hunted for food, the animals would already have been eating the nano-shit accumulating on the forest floor for decades. If you bought it from the store all the meat would come from vaccinated livestock, everything else would be fake or over processed junk food. If you got sick from that or for any other reason you would go see a rube doctor who would poison you some more. If you have teeth, just fluorinating all the water would ensure that sooner or later you would end up in a dentist chair getting vaxxed with adulterated painkillers. They left no stone unturned in an attempt to leave you without anywhere to escape this inevitable fate.
But covid, glorious covid was special. It would be both a magic bullet and a "catch-all", "invented" long ago, even patented, ahead of it "leaking" in 2019, and that would take the blame for the radiation sickness that would result from firing up every wireless thing they invented. It is the emissions they produce that has been an ever increasing a threat to health from the invention of the telegraph, to the advances in military radar at the end of WWI, to the very first AT&T brick phone, until the present day, where now we find ourselves all literally trapped in an active planet-sized microwave oven, forever blazing on high.
Somebody wisely foresaw that vaccine "hesitancy" was bound to turn into vaccine "hell no", so they knew damn well they could never actually vaccinate everyone, and before they hit this wall they would need to have lots of other ways to dose people without their knowledge standing by, ready and waiting. They know mainlining this poison is the next best thing to a nasopharyngeal administration vector, so adulterating medical injectables, annual flu shots and covid tests were a no-brainer but, to get everyone they would need to poison them every possible way there was to do that, so no matter where a person went or whatever they did, they were completely surrounded by traps, and almost everything on the planet being manufactured by their own "stakeholders" it was so easy to do that they simply poisoned everything with nano graphene!
They have by now, most certainly managed to nano-install every last person they could in some way. Nobody can really tell you what is safe and what's is not anymore. It’s a total crapshoot.
If you ate food, it would be full of nanotech, if you drank any water from the secondary water supply, it would be poisoned with nanotech. If you if you lived in the wilderness smart dust would rain down on you. If you hunted for food, the animals would already have been eating the nano-shit accumulating on the forest floor for decades. If you bought it from the store all the meat would come from vaccinated livestock, everything else would be fake or over processed junk food. If you got sick from that or for any other reason you would go see a rube doctor who would poison you some more. If you have teeth, just fluorinating all the water would ensure that sooner or later you would end up in a dentist chair getting vaxxed with adulterated painkillers. They left no stone unturned in an attempt to leave you without anywhere to escape this inevitable fate.
But covid, glorious covid was special. It would be both a magic bullet and a "catch-all", "invented" long ago, even patented, ahead of it "leaking" in 2019, and that would take the blame for the radiation sickness that would result from firing up every wireless thing they invented. It is the emissions they produce that has been an ever increasing a threat to health from the invention of the telegraph, to the advances in military radar at the end of WWI, to the very first AT&T brick phone, until the present day, where now we find ourselves all literally trapped in an active planet-sized microwave oven, forever blazing on high.
If Hell actually is empty, that is only because it is much warmer up here now!
RSS Feed