And it's not just the CDC, it's even trickled down to dictionaries. For those of us that know certain rock solid exhaustively proven facts, that have been medical common knowledge for years, we can see how those facts are being contaminated with pro-vaccine and particularly pro-covid hysteria falsehoods and omissions.
On Jan 8th 2021, Merriam Webster changed the definition of 'Vaccine' to include mRNA types that did not, and still do not, qualify as vaccines under statutory law or by the FDA's normal approval process. This is being done to discredit people like me who understand that mRNA vaccines are being fraudulently promoted as vaccines when they are really experimental genetic therapies and that is the exact approval they got from the FDA. These shots were allowed under a different set of rules called 'Emergency Use Authorization'. They are NOT APPROVED, they are being allowed, because had they 'approved them' mRNA shots could not called vaccines because vaccines are defined clearly in state and federal laws with stipulations that define what a vaccine is by what it does. To be called a vaccine they must produce immunity AND negatively impact transmissibility, neither of which are provided by mRNA products. This is a game of semantics that is going on to support public assurances made by the organizations we are told to trust, who are lying to us when they sell these shots to us under an assumption, that they actively encourage we make, that these covid shots are vaccines in the traditional sense and that they provide protections they absolutely do not provide.
On Jan 8th 2021, Merriam Webster changed the definition of 'Vaccine' to include mRNA types that did not, and still do not, qualify as vaccines under statutory law or by the FDA's normal approval process. This is being done to discredit people like me who understand that mRNA vaccines are being fraudulently promoted as vaccines when they are really experimental genetic therapies and that is the exact approval they got from the FDA. These shots were allowed under a different set of rules called 'Emergency Use Authorization'. They are NOT APPROVED, they are being allowed, because had they 'approved them' mRNA shots could not called vaccines because vaccines are defined clearly in state and federal laws with stipulations that define what a vaccine is by what it does. To be called a vaccine they must produce immunity AND negatively impact transmissibility, neither of which are provided by mRNA products. This is a game of semantics that is going on to support public assurances made by the organizations we are told to trust, who are lying to us when they sell these shots to us under an assumption, that they actively encourage we make, that these covid shots are vaccines in the traditional sense and that they provide protections they absolutely do not provide.
THIS:
JUST BECAME THIS:
As I have previously shown the CDC did the exact same thing when they changed the definition on their website and removed all reference to herd immunity being a natural process and replaced it with a definition that now states that herd immunity is a state that can only be achieved through vaccination, which is completely false!
What's more shocking is despite the CDC getting called out for this obvious lie their response was to change it YET AGAIN to include more lies in which they added the statement that "herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not exposing them to it." THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!
What's more shocking is despite the CDC getting called out for this obvious lie their response was to change it YET AGAIN to include more lies in which they added the statement that "herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not exposing them to it." THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!
The CDC cannot be trusted, period.
But wait, there's more: In February, THIS MONTH, they changed it AGAIN, most likely due to public opinion tracking they analyze that tells them how effective a given deception is.
It now reads:
So you see what is happening here I hope. They are trying very hard to legitimatize mRNA products as useful 'vaccines' and fool you into thinking they work like traditional vaccines and provide the protections traditional vaccines provide.
THEY DON"T.
THIS IS OUTRIGHT FRAUD!
THIS IS OUTRIGHT FRAUD!
Journalists that kill: Example #1 - Josh O'Brian
THIS IS A LIE: Coronavirus vaccine side effects – and why being ill after jab ‘is good’
"Some of those who have had the coronavirus vaccine have experienced side effects, but that can actually be a sign of the jab working, according to experts" Yes, he actually wrote that! What experts Josh?
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/health/coronavirus-vaccine-side-effects--23429831
THIS IS A LIE: Coronavirus vaccine side effects – and why being ill after jab ‘is good’
"Some of those who have had the coronavirus vaccine have experienced side effects, but that can actually be a sign of the jab working, according to experts" Yes, he actually wrote that! What experts Josh?
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/health/coronavirus-vaccine-side-effects--23429831
This sort of thing ENRAGES me.
When it comes to pandemic lies, this is a worst case example
of negligence in journalism that will directly cause suffering and death.
Josh O'Brien is an accessory to MURDER.
When it comes to pandemic lies, this is a worst case example
of negligence in journalism that will directly cause suffering and death.
Josh O'Brien is an accessory to MURDER.
Example #2 - Jessica Knibbs: Death is a good thing 'experts' say.
Do I even need to point out what wrong with this?
RSS Feed