Too Much "Shut the Hell Up"
An ever increasing level of unwarranted censorship across the board should be a huge concern for everyone, much more so than it is at present. Whatever side of whatever debate you are on, the thing that matters most is that a debate is POSSIBLE, and what should concern you, and everyone really, is the current level of paranoia, coming entirely from one side of every discussion, that you cannot be counted on to make a decision that agrees with them.
At the very least you should feel, at some level, that your intelligence is being insulted, because it is. And the manner in which this censorship is being imposed is pitting your intelligence against an inferior replica of it. Artificial intelligence is just what it sounds like; artificial. Its not better, not smarter, AI cannot tell the difference between a dog and a cat, and yet it is being used to decide whether or not you have any right to share your opinion, on anything, with anyone else.
Consider that all these silly rules about maintaining a physical distance between yourself and another person is bad enough, but even if that had any benefit, nobody is likely to catch 'covid' from their personal computer devices unless they are a robot of some sort, and media censorship is an answer to the problem of us all being basically shoulder to shoulder in the same room when we are online or sitting down with a book or newspaper. So to curb that proclivity we now have the term 'misinformation', and the only definition of misinformation that applies is one in which you have some opinion that differs from the one you are supposed to have. To further that oppression we now have Vladimir Voronkov -Executive Director of the UN Office of Counter Terrorism leaning on domain hosts in the UK and un-registering entire websites with impunity based on nothing. These crackdowns are being applied to people like me, and I have little doubt it may affect me at some point.
Domain Level Censorship by the United Nations
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGgptMetfqWm/?list=subscriptions
The letter of death:
At the very least you should feel, at some level, that your intelligence is being insulted, because it is. And the manner in which this censorship is being imposed is pitting your intelligence against an inferior replica of it. Artificial intelligence is just what it sounds like; artificial. Its not better, not smarter, AI cannot tell the difference between a dog and a cat, and yet it is being used to decide whether or not you have any right to share your opinion, on anything, with anyone else.
Consider that all these silly rules about maintaining a physical distance between yourself and another person is bad enough, but even if that had any benefit, nobody is likely to catch 'covid' from their personal computer devices unless they are a robot of some sort, and media censorship is an answer to the problem of us all being basically shoulder to shoulder in the same room when we are online or sitting down with a book or newspaper. So to curb that proclivity we now have the term 'misinformation', and the only definition of misinformation that applies is one in which you have some opinion that differs from the one you are supposed to have. To further that oppression we now have Vladimir Voronkov -Executive Director of the UN Office of Counter Terrorism leaning on domain hosts in the UK and un-registering entire websites with impunity based on nothing. These crackdowns are being applied to people like me, and I have little doubt it may affect me at some point.
Domain Level Censorship by the United Nations
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FGgptMetfqWm/?list=subscriptions
The letter of death:
There's no appeal here. Once summary judgement is passed by some smart toaster at the UN an entire site is invisible. I question what happens when the domain host wants to get paid, and if some refund is due for those who pay their web hosting fees in advance. If you run a domain hosting company or work for one, I'd start asking questions and advise you to object to such activity. Really, that is where the rubber meets the road here.
Finding Hot Lots With VAERS
Moving on from that to the question of vaccine hot lots we find two highly qualified people, namely Jessica Rose PhD, and Craig Paardekooper who have with their respective analysis uncovered countless problems that, as they point out, may never be entirely proven if that proof lies soley upon VAERS data. This is due to a number a reasons, not the least of which is that VAERS data is being withheld, selectively disclosed, and even REMOVED by the same agency that compiles it. This is information that is collected, supposedly, for public health reasons, and to provide an advance warning system for the medical community that protects the public from harm caused by dangerous vaccines products.
The person behind the BitCute channel "Welcometheeagle88" has garnered lots of attention for his exceptional analysis of VAERS data since covid vaccinations began, and thanks to his expertise the reveals proving the data has been extensively rigged and actively managed is beyond question at this point.
STUNNING VAERS LOT# ANALYSIS BY JESSICA ROSE, PHD – DO THEY EXIST?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jymVeHfcm09W/?list=subscriptions
Putting aside for the moment the fact that this sytem is clearly glowing radioactively, flashing lights and sounding sirens due to the astonishingly high incidence rates of death, sterillity and permanent disabillity that cannot have any other reason for showing up at all were in not for a recent covid injection, the clear evidence that what data we can see is being carefully managed is a morass of corruption as deep as the Atlantic ocean.
If you want to see just how complex the job is to parse out from this data enough to convict, here is the tip of that iceberg:
THE FINE ART OF LETHAL DOSE TESTING:
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-someone-staggering-the-more-toxic
CRAIG PAARDEKOOPER'S ANALYSIS
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/batch-codes-and-toxicity_rQ5czVxXNoWpJuh.html
ANDREAS OEHLER - Exposing THE EXPOSE
WHY ONLY 5% OF THE PFIZER LOTS "SEEM" TO BE CAUSING 100% OF THE DAMAGE
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/exposing-the-expose-in-good-way
The person behind the BitCute channel "Welcometheeagle88" has garnered lots of attention for his exceptional analysis of VAERS data since covid vaccinations began, and thanks to his expertise the reveals proving the data has been extensively rigged and actively managed is beyond question at this point.
STUNNING VAERS LOT# ANALYSIS BY JESSICA ROSE, PHD – DO THEY EXIST?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jymVeHfcm09W/?list=subscriptions
Putting aside for the moment the fact that this sytem is clearly glowing radioactively, flashing lights and sounding sirens due to the astonishingly high incidence rates of death, sterillity and permanent disabillity that cannot have any other reason for showing up at all were in not for a recent covid injection, the clear evidence that what data we can see is being carefully managed is a morass of corruption as deep as the Atlantic ocean.
If you want to see just how complex the job is to parse out from this data enough to convict, here is the tip of that iceberg:
THE FINE ART OF LETHAL DOSE TESTING:
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-someone-staggering-the-more-toxic
CRAIG PAARDEKOOPER'S ANALYSIS
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/batch-codes-and-toxicity_rQ5czVxXNoWpJuh.html
ANDREAS OEHLER - Exposing THE EXPOSE
WHY ONLY 5% OF THE PFIZER LOTS "SEEM" TO BE CAUSING 100% OF THE DAMAGE
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/exposing-the-expose-in-good-way
Craig commented:
"There is observed clustering of VL data according to AE reports and it appears that the manufacturers deployed more toxic VLs at distinctly staggered intervals.
If it was pre-determined or ‘learned’ as the roll-out progressed which vials lots were indeed more toxic than others (perhaps Moderna’s 039K20A which is more highly associated with death reports, for example, has a higher mRNA payload), then it would be conceivable that someone would not only have the ability to stagger the deadlier VLs, but that they indeed would do so. "
This is no longer speculation. It is happening, but proving it is happening to a degree that what these people clearly see going on can be presented absolutely free of any plausible doubt considering the blatant data manipulation that is happening concurrently, is probably too high a bar to vault over. However, what does not require much effort is showing how much of a villain Pfizer has been in the past:
"There is observed clustering of VL data according to AE reports and it appears that the manufacturers deployed more toxic VLs at distinctly staggered intervals.
If it was pre-determined or ‘learned’ as the roll-out progressed which vials lots were indeed more toxic than others (perhaps Moderna’s 039K20A which is more highly associated with death reports, for example, has a higher mRNA payload), then it would be conceivable that someone would not only have the ability to stagger the deadlier VLs, but that they indeed would do so. "
This is no longer speculation. It is happening, but proving it is happening to a degree that what these people clearly see going on can be presented absolutely free of any plausible doubt considering the blatant data manipulation that is happening concurrently, is probably too high a bar to vault over. However, what does not require much effort is showing how much of a villain Pfizer has been in the past:
I hate to be the one that says it, because its not all that "American" to do so, but then neither is this company. Pfizer should be considered GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT! Pfizer has made due process an undue burden by calculated design, and deception has become a high art form, proudly on display in every pie they have their fingers in, which has come to include just about every pie, even those already eaten.
Monetary penalties, even at this level, provide no deterrent at all for Pfizer, a company whose executive management should be immediately hung in public gallows while the entire company has its assets frozen and redistributed to its victims and what remains of it is forcibly dismantled. The extent of damage they have caused is presently unimaginable and getting worse with every minute we allow them to continue. I suspect the amount they have been fined in the past is less than the amount they spend on floor wax. It is money that is just not even missed, like the pocket change you lose in your couch.
The difficulty with using VARES data is meticulously pointed out in miles of substack commentary posted by Jessica Rose and others. For those of you who are unfamiliar with Jessica's contributions, it was her analysis that conclusively showed with a brilliant statistical report, that any incidence number reported in VARES is precisely off by a factor of 41. In other words, if VAERS is reporting 19,532 deaths associated with covid vaccinations (The number valid as of Nov 26th, 2021) the ACTUAL number of deaths is 41 times higher, or specifically, a whopping 800,812!!!
It can easily be proven that the majority of these deaths result after a dose was given from less that 5% of the total vials Pfizer and other companies shipped. We can see that from the lot numbers associated with those deaths. Some lots are "hot."
But knowing this only seems to create more questions than they answer. For example, it is only an assumption that as vials and lots of vials are created they are subsequently shipped, delivered and administered in a first in first out manner. This appears not to be the case. What the data seems to show if we focus on hot lot numbers is a strange pattern of partial hot lots being utilized while the remainder of that same lot sits in storage somewhere until much later, in many cases eight months later, when it again begins to appear in VAERS death reports.
Even more strange is the apparent collusion that seems to exist between Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson, in which the reports of death being added to VAERS only seem to point to a lot number that is produced by just one company at a time, as if they were 'taking turns' releasing hot lots. This pattern is just glaring when you look at it, and this is what Craig Paardekooper believes is happening. The problem with graphing that pattern out accurately has to do with pulling the right reports, and those lists can only be made inclusive enough if the data you use to sort them is clean. Its not.
The serial number nomenclature used by each company to track specific lots is unique and Johnson and Johnson even has two distinctly different nomenclatures, which is very suspicious. One is a series of 7 digits while the other includes two alpha characters in the middle of the series. All of the manufacturers utilize alpha characters, but they are positioned in the serial numbers in such a way that each company can be separated from the other in a sequential numeric series, with Johnson and Johnson providing cover with two different numbering practices that throw a bit of a monkey wrench into the process of parsing out each manufacturer separately from the others. Still, it can be done, and when you do that you find clearly distinct columns of data points stacked up, separated by brief periods of no reports and followed by a new company providing the deadly doses cited in the next wave of report months. Any more simple x/y graph of death incidences over time show nothing more than a random scatter plot if one includes all the companies products in the same graph. But parse out just one, and this is clearly a pattern that cannot possibly be random, and I think this is evidence of pre-planning, because its just too strange that it all works out this way so neatly, and that it takes some additional and unusual steps to uncover their malfeasance.
Add to the difficulties that have been woven into the data by design certain inconsistencies that result from flawed data entry. There is no good reason in this day and age for a database like VAERS not to have strict data entry rules in every field. People entering lot numbers into reports sometimes have no number to add, others are allowed to add parenthesis and dashes indiscriminately when none should be there, some enter partial numbers. All this makes any analysis questionable, and that is a fixable problem that has curiously been allowed to exist, and it’s a problem that persists because, in my opinion anyhow, it benefits those perpetrating the crimes by creating a mess.
What has gotten very little attention is the fact that pharmacovigilance data being collected and kept entirely separately by each manufacturer, data they can protect under rules that make it proprietary, is far more detailed and strict, and a recent look into some of that data brought forward by a Moderna whistleblower was very revealing and I covered that when it happened. There we saw near total situational awareness in a data set of vaccine recipients that makes the data in VAERS complete garbage by comparison. THIS is the data everyone needs to have open access to, not the indecipherable mess that captured regulatory agencies provide us with, data that even in its current dilapidated state is screaming STOP! Data that they clearly ignore and only claim to utilize in their corrupt approvals processes.
Monetary penalties, even at this level, provide no deterrent at all for Pfizer, a company whose executive management should be immediately hung in public gallows while the entire company has its assets frozen and redistributed to its victims and what remains of it is forcibly dismantled. The extent of damage they have caused is presently unimaginable and getting worse with every minute we allow them to continue. I suspect the amount they have been fined in the past is less than the amount they spend on floor wax. It is money that is just not even missed, like the pocket change you lose in your couch.
The difficulty with using VARES data is meticulously pointed out in miles of substack commentary posted by Jessica Rose and others. For those of you who are unfamiliar with Jessica's contributions, it was her analysis that conclusively showed with a brilliant statistical report, that any incidence number reported in VARES is precisely off by a factor of 41. In other words, if VAERS is reporting 19,532 deaths associated with covid vaccinations (The number valid as of Nov 26th, 2021) the ACTUAL number of deaths is 41 times higher, or specifically, a whopping 800,812!!!
It can easily be proven that the majority of these deaths result after a dose was given from less that 5% of the total vials Pfizer and other companies shipped. We can see that from the lot numbers associated with those deaths. Some lots are "hot."
But knowing this only seems to create more questions than they answer. For example, it is only an assumption that as vials and lots of vials are created they are subsequently shipped, delivered and administered in a first in first out manner. This appears not to be the case. What the data seems to show if we focus on hot lot numbers is a strange pattern of partial hot lots being utilized while the remainder of that same lot sits in storage somewhere until much later, in many cases eight months later, when it again begins to appear in VAERS death reports.
Even more strange is the apparent collusion that seems to exist between Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson, in which the reports of death being added to VAERS only seem to point to a lot number that is produced by just one company at a time, as if they were 'taking turns' releasing hot lots. This pattern is just glaring when you look at it, and this is what Craig Paardekooper believes is happening. The problem with graphing that pattern out accurately has to do with pulling the right reports, and those lists can only be made inclusive enough if the data you use to sort them is clean. Its not.
The serial number nomenclature used by each company to track specific lots is unique and Johnson and Johnson even has two distinctly different nomenclatures, which is very suspicious. One is a series of 7 digits while the other includes two alpha characters in the middle of the series. All of the manufacturers utilize alpha characters, but they are positioned in the serial numbers in such a way that each company can be separated from the other in a sequential numeric series, with Johnson and Johnson providing cover with two different numbering practices that throw a bit of a monkey wrench into the process of parsing out each manufacturer separately from the others. Still, it can be done, and when you do that you find clearly distinct columns of data points stacked up, separated by brief periods of no reports and followed by a new company providing the deadly doses cited in the next wave of report months. Any more simple x/y graph of death incidences over time show nothing more than a random scatter plot if one includes all the companies products in the same graph. But parse out just one, and this is clearly a pattern that cannot possibly be random, and I think this is evidence of pre-planning, because its just too strange that it all works out this way so neatly, and that it takes some additional and unusual steps to uncover their malfeasance.
Add to the difficulties that have been woven into the data by design certain inconsistencies that result from flawed data entry. There is no good reason in this day and age for a database like VAERS not to have strict data entry rules in every field. People entering lot numbers into reports sometimes have no number to add, others are allowed to add parenthesis and dashes indiscriminately when none should be there, some enter partial numbers. All this makes any analysis questionable, and that is a fixable problem that has curiously been allowed to exist, and it’s a problem that persists because, in my opinion anyhow, it benefits those perpetrating the crimes by creating a mess.
What has gotten very little attention is the fact that pharmacovigilance data being collected and kept entirely separately by each manufacturer, data they can protect under rules that make it proprietary, is far more detailed and strict, and a recent look into some of that data brought forward by a Moderna whistleblower was very revealing and I covered that when it happened. There we saw near total situational awareness in a data set of vaccine recipients that makes the data in VAERS complete garbage by comparison. THIS is the data everyone needs to have open access to, not the indecipherable mess that captured regulatory agencies provide us with, data that even in its current dilapidated state is screaming STOP! Data that they clearly ignore and only claim to utilize in their corrupt approvals processes.
Claims of proprietary ownership be dammed.
Show me the records Pfizer is keeping on the population of Israel!
Show me the records Pfizer is keeping on the population of Israel!
What Makes A Hot Lot "HOT"?
Here we need to get into the question of whether or not covid vaccines contain Graphene HYDROXIDE.
I covered recently the brutal slaying of Dr. Andreas Noack, who had the rare distinction of being the most credible, most highly knowledgeable expert in all of Europe on carbon nano particulate substances, who shortly before his death publicly disclosed the dangers of injecting people with graphene hydroxide and the fact that this was a yet another undisclosed ingredient that would eventually be found in all covid vaccines. Dr. Noack warned that this is a substance that is akin to nano-sized razor blades, and that injecting it into people is an efficient way to slice them up internally and that the result of such a dangerous poisoning would mimic any number of serious illnesses, but every exposure in this manner would mean certain death.
It has been shown in the published analysis done by multiple independent labs of vaccine vials collected from all manufacturers that graphene oxide is found in them. Is graphene hydroxide being used as well?
I have a suspicion here I cannot really prove, but this is what I think; First of all, it is definitely in at least some batches, that is confirmed by numerous patents, that have been collected by Dr. Ariyana Love, and she discussed several of these on a recent Stew Peters interview.
MODERNA PATENT UNCOVERS HORROR: NANOCENSOR CONTAINED IN BIOWEAPON
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lC31LrIlNYMP/
These patents are the only place anyone can really go for hard evidence of undisclosed ingredients outside of actual lab analysis, and I have not yet seen a lab analysis that confirms graphene hydroxide yet, but I expect to shortly, because clinically the symptoms one would expect to result from that substance in the bloodstream are turning up all over, so it's just a matter of time. rGO was confirmed with exactly the same pattern of discovery and subsequent confirmation. As with all lab work one needs to know what they are looking for before it can even be found.
There are definitely certain things that make a hot lot deadly. One I discovered, that I can support with published technical research papers on how to manufacture stabilize and deliver mRNA, is the total amount of mRNA that is delivered in a specific mix. The reason it was decided to stagger Pfizer and Moderna doses and give you two instead of one big one is clearly stated in these papers. Too much is deadly at one time, because the result of such an exposure would be a massive immune system response that would all by itself cause such a degree of inflammation that death would be either instant or near immediate. The ADR incidence would be through the roof if they did that, so they give you that much with 30 days in between, and I can prove that is true. Which all by itself ought to be a huge story, because covid boosters are said to have 3x the amount inside a single shot than the amount contained is a single shot from the 2 dose sequence! I expect to see a lot more instant death from those boosters, but a higher percentage of placebos as well to hide it.
My other , that is much more difficult to prove without an actual lab analysis of a suspected hot lot, is that we are likely to find an elevated level of graphene hydroxide content in the hot lots. That would follow intuitively, but like I said, all I can prove is that they are using it. I just can't pin down where or how frequently with any certainty just yet.
I covered recently the brutal slaying of Dr. Andreas Noack, who had the rare distinction of being the most credible, most highly knowledgeable expert in all of Europe on carbon nano particulate substances, who shortly before his death publicly disclosed the dangers of injecting people with graphene hydroxide and the fact that this was a yet another undisclosed ingredient that would eventually be found in all covid vaccines. Dr. Noack warned that this is a substance that is akin to nano-sized razor blades, and that injecting it into people is an efficient way to slice them up internally and that the result of such a dangerous poisoning would mimic any number of serious illnesses, but every exposure in this manner would mean certain death.
It has been shown in the published analysis done by multiple independent labs of vaccine vials collected from all manufacturers that graphene oxide is found in them. Is graphene hydroxide being used as well?
I have a suspicion here I cannot really prove, but this is what I think; First of all, it is definitely in at least some batches, that is confirmed by numerous patents, that have been collected by Dr. Ariyana Love, and she discussed several of these on a recent Stew Peters interview.
MODERNA PATENT UNCOVERS HORROR: NANOCENSOR CONTAINED IN BIOWEAPON
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lC31LrIlNYMP/
These patents are the only place anyone can really go for hard evidence of undisclosed ingredients outside of actual lab analysis, and I have not yet seen a lab analysis that confirms graphene hydroxide yet, but I expect to shortly, because clinically the symptoms one would expect to result from that substance in the bloodstream are turning up all over, so it's just a matter of time. rGO was confirmed with exactly the same pattern of discovery and subsequent confirmation. As with all lab work one needs to know what they are looking for before it can even be found.
There are definitely certain things that make a hot lot deadly. One I discovered, that I can support with published technical research papers on how to manufacture stabilize and deliver mRNA, is the total amount of mRNA that is delivered in a specific mix. The reason it was decided to stagger Pfizer and Moderna doses and give you two instead of one big one is clearly stated in these papers. Too much is deadly at one time, because the result of such an exposure would be a massive immune system response that would all by itself cause such a degree of inflammation that death would be either instant or near immediate. The ADR incidence would be through the roof if they did that, so they give you that much with 30 days in between, and I can prove that is true. Which all by itself ought to be a huge story, because covid boosters are said to have 3x the amount inside a single shot than the amount contained is a single shot from the 2 dose sequence! I expect to see a lot more instant death from those boosters, but a higher percentage of placebos as well to hide it.
My other , that is much more difficult to prove without an actual lab analysis of a suspected hot lot, is that we are likely to find an elevated level of graphene hydroxide content in the hot lots. That would follow intuitively, but like I said, all I can prove is that they are using it. I just can't pin down where or how frequently with any certainty just yet.
In summary, the age old rule about "what we don't know we don't know" applies here.
There is no good reason,
no acceptable level of fear,
no threat of disease, personal poverty or social separation,
nothing you want or need access to,
that is worth sacrificing your life for,
by rolling a pair of loaded dice
and opting for a covid vaccine.
With nothing to gain and everything to lose,
the stakes are just too high.
RSS Feed