Ok, so I have seen this in the lame-stream news quite a bit since it happened and since I have seen just how poor and scripted the news services have become I listen to them a different way than most people do. I also don’t hear any answers to the questions I have about this that I feel I am being led AWAY from by all the time filler and chatter than conveys absolutely nothing about the event they are talking about.
Have you ever noticed you can watch one of these broadcasts for an hour and hear about one maybe two stories and come away with barely three facts about it after all that ‘analysis’?
For one thing, I rail against these 24 hour news stations and feel they offer no value whatsoever. I listen to them like you would an enemy because they are telling me what to think and if YOU really think about it that’s exactly what they do. There is no reporting anymore. What passes for reporting is a non-stop roll out of random talking heads nobody knows giving their thoughts and opinions on everything like you are in a room with a bunch of other people in some kind of focus group setting. This is NOT reporting.
Journalism used to require objectivity which is completely absent these days. Yes, is it convenient to be able to flip on a station like FOX or CNN and regardless of what time you check it there is something of importance being presented, but it is this same convenience that dupes people into accepting what they hear as fact when it is little more than a bunch of suggestions placed into your mind by a hypnotist.
So when this story broke one thing I noticed was how many times the following phrase was repeated “All we know is that no conclusions can be made at this time” and I began counting. In any given presentation this phrase was repeated every third sentence for as long as the reporter rambled on which was as long as 14 minutes in some cases. Don’t you think that is strange? What did I recall after any of those reports? What did you recall? Plane went down, no answers why. That is it.
Now let’s think about it a minute.
Only recently have we begun to see vanishing plane stories. This never happened before. We had two in recent memory that occupied the news ad-nauseum for a month each. Did you ever actually learn anything about either of them. If so, what was it? Now there's this one. Here's what I am interested in:
WHO WAS ON THAT PLANE? I heard three Egyptian air marshals but that’s not enough to raise my suspicion. Who else of note died on that flight? Whenever planes go down like this we usually learn later that someone of some influence or importance was lost and that is likely the reason it went down. I have seen many weird, usually small plane crashes, that involved some political figure or banker or otherwise influential passenger and its not until well after the crash, when there's nothing else to say about it, that some investigative person publishes a conspiracy theory that if one were to look at it objectively could actually have some credibility, but once the public’s short term memory period passes these opinions fight to get any traction anyplace so you need to dig for information about it. That’s what I see happening here. We are being told there are no conclusions to draw, repeatedly, so we won’t be inclined to make any or ask any questions. Then, and this is what I expect since it is a formula here that is being used over and over, sometime next month or the month after we will hear, in a very short report you will probably not even notice amidst the din of the ‘report du jour’ of the day, the conclusion that was reached after all the intense investigation we are supposed to just assume has been going on all that time because they tell us so. And that ‘conclusion’ will attribute the reason for the crash to some object of hatred that will be offered up to steer public opinion toward some new air travel restriction or random enemy we need to fight now or it will support and provide justification for a bill in the news or action someone ‘fighting for you’ will want. I mean c’mon people, are we really this disinterested or gullible? I think possibly we are since this propaganda technique seems to work.
WHERE IS THE SITE OF THE CRASH? Oh there's all this radar information baloney that offers nothing but ‘now you see it now you don’t’. Is that fact reporting or filler? Tell me what is known, not what is unknown, you camera friendly, overpaid assholes! My time is valuable. Yours is clearly not.
And, if and when it is found, WHERE IS THE BLACK BOX? I recall when these intentionally indestructibly enginneered devices were infallible and always recovered. What changed? Anything? Are they now made out of paper-mache in a North Korean labor camp? Funny how we cant seem to find them now or if we hear they are found they don’t seem to be useful anymore in determining a damn thing about the event. But we have pilots that are radical Islamists and depressed and over medicated or tired. Anything to distract our thinking away from a critical examination of the actual facts of these events. If later we hear that the pilot posted a single sympathetic tweet or Facebook entry about some mid-eastern religion or something he was upset about are we going to accept that circumstantial evidence as the most likely explanation for this and simply stop asking questions? Seems like that is exactly what happened the last two times. Now I ask you, if you purposely caused this event, what would you prefer the fate of the indestructible black box be?
So now we have the formula:
Whack someone out, say nothing about it but “we don’t know what happened for one month, then offer a shitty conjecture once the story becomes irrelevant or doesn’t attract much attention and ALA-KA-ZAM! Just like that we now have ‘history’.
WATCH FOR THIS IN EVERYTHING YOU HEAR ABOUT IF YOU TUNE IN TO THESE HYPNO-CHANNELS.
ONCE YOU KNOW HOW THE TRICK IS DONE, YOU WILL SEE IT BEING DONE EVERYWHERE.
Have you ever noticed you can watch one of these broadcasts for an hour and hear about one maybe two stories and come away with barely three facts about it after all that ‘analysis’?
For one thing, I rail against these 24 hour news stations and feel they offer no value whatsoever. I listen to them like you would an enemy because they are telling me what to think and if YOU really think about it that’s exactly what they do. There is no reporting anymore. What passes for reporting is a non-stop roll out of random talking heads nobody knows giving their thoughts and opinions on everything like you are in a room with a bunch of other people in some kind of focus group setting. This is NOT reporting.
Journalism used to require objectivity which is completely absent these days. Yes, is it convenient to be able to flip on a station like FOX or CNN and regardless of what time you check it there is something of importance being presented, but it is this same convenience that dupes people into accepting what they hear as fact when it is little more than a bunch of suggestions placed into your mind by a hypnotist.
So when this story broke one thing I noticed was how many times the following phrase was repeated “All we know is that no conclusions can be made at this time” and I began counting. In any given presentation this phrase was repeated every third sentence for as long as the reporter rambled on which was as long as 14 minutes in some cases. Don’t you think that is strange? What did I recall after any of those reports? What did you recall? Plane went down, no answers why. That is it.
Now let’s think about it a minute.
Only recently have we begun to see vanishing plane stories. This never happened before. We had two in recent memory that occupied the news ad-nauseum for a month each. Did you ever actually learn anything about either of them. If so, what was it? Now there's this one. Here's what I am interested in:
WHO WAS ON THAT PLANE? I heard three Egyptian air marshals but that’s not enough to raise my suspicion. Who else of note died on that flight? Whenever planes go down like this we usually learn later that someone of some influence or importance was lost and that is likely the reason it went down. I have seen many weird, usually small plane crashes, that involved some political figure or banker or otherwise influential passenger and its not until well after the crash, when there's nothing else to say about it, that some investigative person publishes a conspiracy theory that if one were to look at it objectively could actually have some credibility, but once the public’s short term memory period passes these opinions fight to get any traction anyplace so you need to dig for information about it. That’s what I see happening here. We are being told there are no conclusions to draw, repeatedly, so we won’t be inclined to make any or ask any questions. Then, and this is what I expect since it is a formula here that is being used over and over, sometime next month or the month after we will hear, in a very short report you will probably not even notice amidst the din of the ‘report du jour’ of the day, the conclusion that was reached after all the intense investigation we are supposed to just assume has been going on all that time because they tell us so. And that ‘conclusion’ will attribute the reason for the crash to some object of hatred that will be offered up to steer public opinion toward some new air travel restriction or random enemy we need to fight now or it will support and provide justification for a bill in the news or action someone ‘fighting for you’ will want. I mean c’mon people, are we really this disinterested or gullible? I think possibly we are since this propaganda technique seems to work.
WHERE IS THE SITE OF THE CRASH? Oh there's all this radar information baloney that offers nothing but ‘now you see it now you don’t’. Is that fact reporting or filler? Tell me what is known, not what is unknown, you camera friendly, overpaid assholes! My time is valuable. Yours is clearly not.
And, if and when it is found, WHERE IS THE BLACK BOX? I recall when these intentionally indestructibly enginneered devices were infallible and always recovered. What changed? Anything? Are they now made out of paper-mache in a North Korean labor camp? Funny how we cant seem to find them now or if we hear they are found they don’t seem to be useful anymore in determining a damn thing about the event. But we have pilots that are radical Islamists and depressed and over medicated or tired. Anything to distract our thinking away from a critical examination of the actual facts of these events. If later we hear that the pilot posted a single sympathetic tweet or Facebook entry about some mid-eastern religion or something he was upset about are we going to accept that circumstantial evidence as the most likely explanation for this and simply stop asking questions? Seems like that is exactly what happened the last two times. Now I ask you, if you purposely caused this event, what would you prefer the fate of the indestructible black box be?
So now we have the formula:
Whack someone out, say nothing about it but “we don’t know what happened for one month, then offer a shitty conjecture once the story becomes irrelevant or doesn’t attract much attention and ALA-KA-ZAM! Just like that we now have ‘history’.
WATCH FOR THIS IN EVERYTHING YOU HEAR ABOUT IF YOU TUNE IN TO THESE HYPNO-CHANNELS.
ONCE YOU KNOW HOW THE TRICK IS DONE, YOU WILL SEE IT BEING DONE EVERYWHERE.
RSS Feed