https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/22/genocide.aspx
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression
- The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum
- According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute
- The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects
- The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court
According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.
“In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.”
In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:
- Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
- Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
- Bill Gates
- Melinda Gates
- Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
- Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
- Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
- Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
- Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
- Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
- Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
- Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
- Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
- June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
- Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
- Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum
At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.
“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April 2021.
What Is the International Criminal Court?
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S.
The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that doesn’t always happen.
If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in question from criminal responsibility.
As noted in the complaint:
“We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.
The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution. This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”
Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.
The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects.
Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”
While not a binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom and principles of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.
Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:
- Killing
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm
- Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility
- Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction
- All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to “conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction,” this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns, and damaging people’s immune systems through the refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates and coercing people to take the COVID jab.
Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes:
Murder
-Imprisonment or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law
-Torture
-Enforced sterilizations
-Apartheid and other inhumane acts
Extermination
-Persecution of any identifiable group
The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support them.
War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.” They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that:
“... the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’
We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”
War crimes listed in the complaint include:
-Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots.
Not only are they asking for a full investigation into the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, they also want a full investigation into the suspected assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist and a top graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral thesis described the conversion of graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. According to the complaint:
Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the university of Almeria, and alongside Dr. Andreas Noack he examined the covid ‘vaccines’ for the presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. According to both doctors, the vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide.
*I want to add here some information I will publish here soon and also provide to Reiner Fuellmich's legal committee, that removes the controversy over whether or not covid vaccines contain graphene oxide. Dr. Noack is only partially correct here. Graphene oxide is in fact in the shots and that has been confirmed multiple times by independent researchers including Dr. Robert Young. What has not been found in any of the vials examined is graphene hydroxide in a pure form, but this is not necessary as you will see. Based on my research into the nano-technology that enables drug production and delivery in vivo via remote frequency transmission and advanced manufacturing methods utilizing pulsed EMF to enable the self assembly of dozens of graphene-based nano-particulate substances using only a base of graphene oxide and the presence of combinatory heavy metals, 13 of which Dr. Robert Young has positively identified in various covid vaccine brands by use of advanced spectrographic analysis, it is absolutely possible that graphene hydroxide can be spontaneously generated in vivo, and because all the covid vaccines contain graphene oxide they all install a kind of latent "kill-switch" that can be remotely triggered by exposure to specific EMF frequencies. Please see related research here:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8747623B2/en?q=microwave+assisted+graphene+synthesis+reactions&oq=microwave+assisted+graphene+synthesis+reactions
This is the real "5G connection".
Other research I have discovered recently expose the delivery method to be injectable micro-bubbles (aka microfluidic biochips) that have the ability to enter a cell by passing through the cell wall. Their behavior is suspiciously similar to that of a virus, which I have repeatedly proven does not exist naturally, but it seems, can be created artificially. These microscopic poly-vinyl bubbles have been observed in samples taken from covid vaccine vials under a normal optical microscope by Dr. Zandre Botha but she did not know what they were at the time she saw them, in fact, nobody who has seen these structures has yet been able to identify them, but I now know what they are.
Please refer to this video analysis created by InfoVacunas for an explanation of the process:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HHybNCTeHMY9/
These polyvinyl micro bubble structures can be remotely directed to accumulate in specific tissues and later caused to expand and burst via EMF radiation exposure, releasing their contents either inside a cell or while still in the bodies vasculature.
Additionally, the total amount of mass of graphene oxide in particular can be made to spontaneously multiply as much as 30 times by exposing it to pulse modulated EMF in ranges as low as 1 to 2.47Ghz which are currently in use in most all smart devices. The production of graphene based compounds like graphene hydroxide, and others, can not only be produced in the bodies of vaccinated populations but their presence is able to produce the symptomology of a number of destructive diseases, among which is Marburg, a rare and almost always fatal disease that kills by causing severe hemorrhagic fevers. These are runaway inflammations characterized by internal bleeding that occur in multiple organs all at once. If you recall an earlier piece I did on what has been referred to as MIS or multi-system inflammatory syndrome, this is a similar observation being made adverse event reports seen in vaccinated children, where they die due to the unexplained onset of pericarditis, leading to terminal sepsis as the cause of death.
Marburg in particular is a disease that is so rare you almost never hear of it, but it has received unusual press recently from the CDC and WHO, who have published strange warnings of the possibility of a Marburg epidemic, which makes sense if you consider that this is a disease that can be created in the body of a vaccinated person if the vaccines they received contain both graphene oxide and the right combinatory heavy metals. If graphene oxide can be chemically changed into graphene hydroxide it would react with the body as Dr. Noack describes and victims would die from massive internal bleeding (hemorrhagic fever) since, as Dr. Noack explained before he was murdered, "the presence of graphene hydroxide is like introducing millions of nano razor blades in the blood stream".
Graphene oxide IS in the jabs, of that there is no longer any question, and this has even been confirmed by Karen Kingston, who has even provided the patent that identifies graphene oxide as a "trade secret" undisclosed ingredient in each of the covid vaccines and the company that produces the material, specifically for use by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZenica, and Johnson and Johnson.
It was on the MSDS site that she saw that the company Sinopeg was the company manufacturing these Pegylated lipids for the Covid Vaccines. On the Sinopeg website they list these lipids under the auspices of “Covid-19 Excipients” they also have articles on their website talking about how they do work with graphene oxide. (other companies do the same thing as they are all part of the Graphene Flagship-a Billion Euro project put together by the EU that funds Graphene Oxide research)
On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients ...
On 18th November 2020 Dr. Andreas Noack was on a ‘livestream’ on YouTube discussing the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ when he was arrested on camera by armed German police. On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide he was attacked and murdered.
We request a full investigation be done into the inclusion of Graphene hydroxide in the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack.”
Torture by way of forced mask wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon.
Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID jab mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare, the use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam.
Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part in any hostilities.
Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.
The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:
“This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions."
It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.
The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.
In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfillment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.
This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.
It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.”
In a January 1, 2022, video announcement Dr. Reiner Fuellmich — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and cofounder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss) launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”
Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public.
According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.
There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation. ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.
In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some having a toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have a toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths attributed to them.
Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their experimentation, so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able to do this is because there are no review boards overseeing any of them.
“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation,” Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.
Without doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health and our children’s futures.