Reiner Fuellmich - Grand Jury Testimonies: Day 4

As promised, below is a partially transcribed synopsis of the days proceedings I made. 
​ Please share this widely with everyone you can.

(550 min total)  Different source, so one long clip.  I will break down the evidence by who is speaking.
https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/Grand-Jury-Day-4-online:4
 
So right out of the gate a good point was brought up about the question of whether or not doctors could be considered negligent for not being more aware of what is going on.  You should know that doctors typically DO NOT read medical papers.  They are not as educated as many people assume them to be and most just read headlines in a journal made for the purpose of skimming the latest medical news, much like regular people do when they watch CNN.  The moderator reminded them it is their DUTY to provide the best treatments possible. That is, in fact, their job, so no quarter was given there.
 
(@47 min)  Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Kruger, Molecular Biologist, Cardiovascular Specialist, Germany:  "We don't need vaccines for corona virus.  Government is making a mountain out of a mole hill.  There is no need to fear corona viruses, most of us are already immune.  What we are doing to kids in Germany right now is catastrophic.  SASR-CoV2 is not a novel virus.  People are not dying from a virus.  Those that do have underlying illnesses that weaken their immune system The idea that you have to keep getting boosters because you can no longer find antibodies in blood plasma is absolute nonsense. Antibodies do not remain in the blood for longer than a few weeks, to keep producing them would be a waste of resources.  How to make them remains in immune system memory, so this idea is contrary to basic immunology."  She explained that each variant we have seen is similar enough to the original and others that there should be no need to inoculate for them separately, nor should mRNA alterations be required. "These vaccines do not work.  No mRNA vaccine that produces antibodies in the blood can neutralize a virus that enters through the air, physiologically it cannot work, these vaccines can never work. It's a big, big hoax. "  She followed this by explaining several problems with the human vaccine trials.  "Pfizer cheated." An explanation was given regarding antibody production of two barriers they cannot cross which further demonstrates covid vaccines are incapable of neutralizing virus in the lung.  Any study that shows otherwise can only be done in a lab culture.  Such things would never work in the body.
 
(@1:08 min) Deanna Mcleod - Degrees in Immunology, Psychology.  Founder of the medical research firm Kaleidoscope Strategic Inc. and "COVID Sense".  Work experience includes 10 years of Oncology marketing.  Testimony given pertains to exposure of business practices and deceptive marketing practices in the pharmaceutical industry.  Critical examination of Pfizer human trials.  Pfizer trials did not study transmissibility.  "If a vaccine is unable to stop transmission it is NOT a vaccine."  Trials did not study the population at most risk. The entire trial design was inadequate.

"Anyone making claims that this inoculation is reducing death and hospitalization, that it stops transmission, or reduces severe covid-19 disease based on this trial is making false statements."  Pfizer began human trial research as a blinded study but after just 2 months they then offered participants in the control group to crossover and be vaccinated.  89% of participants did so, and when they did that they not only un-blinded the study but effectively destroyed the control group and all related data, against which safety and efficacy results were to be measured.  This means there was no reliable efficacy and safety data to base their conclusions on.  This is significant because all reported results beyond this 2 month mark were made without experimental controls.  Without control group data a causal link between vaccine delivery and vaccine adverse reactions can never be produced.  Pfizer also reported combined efficacy numbers, by reporting results of adult study participants with a participant group of children which was also studied for a much briefer duration.  Two months as opposed to six in the adult group.  Pfizer took an already diluted data set and watered it down even further by choosing the study methodology that would be both the least reliable and produce the most favorable results.  The way absolute risk and relative risk are calculated, relative risk provides 90+ percentages while absolute risk, a better measure, results in single digit gains in efficacy, hence relative risk was used to make efficacy claims.  using these same measures to calculate risk of adverse events against the benefits of the vaccine the picture changes drastically and clearly shows the risk far outweigh the benefits, even in this watered down subject pool.  There were a total of 20 deaths in the vaccine group after un-blinding, nine of which were from cardiovascular related issues.  Immunobridging trials were used to add efficacy numbers to a very small parallel group of less than 200 children, which is inappropriate because they are not designed to measure efficacy against a placebo group.  They are also not considered an "at risk" group, definitely not the "at risk" group the vaccines were later prioritized for, which were elderly people.  Also, results from this group of children were compared to a group of young adults making the claims of efficacy even more meaningless.

​In Deanna's opinion, anyone making claims of efficacy in children based on these trials  is making false statements.  Increased risk of adverse events vs. benefits gave similar results as before, with 3% absolute risk and 299% relative risk for serious harm, which is particularly alarming given that the group being tested was young children considered to have 0% risk of being a serious covid case whether vaccinated or not.  The British Medical Journal released the results of their investigation of Ventavia, the company hired to conduct the trials and reported them to the FDA for falsifying data, un-blinding participants, not following up on study participants and mislabeling specimens.  The FDA never investigated or audited this company and Pfizer failed to disclose these problems in their EUA application, in fact, Pfizer has now hired Ventavia to conduct four more additional clinical trials.  Conflicts of interest amongst the authors of these studies were profound.  84% of the conflicts were between Pfizer and BioNTech stockholders whose stock values increased 9 BILLION dollars as a result of reporting successful results.  

Since the trials the CEO of Pfizer cashed in, divested a large holding of stock.  The implication being that this may have been done over concerns that eventually this information would come out, and Deanna made this speculation.  Here conclusions were summarized in the next slide:

Her final comment was that based on the evidence, it is hard for her to understand how anyone participating in these trials could have had informed consent of the risks involved.
 
A whistleblower that worked Ventavia, named Brooke Armstrong, has also confirmed Deanna McLeod's findings.  The recent dramatic fall of Pfizer's stock price makes this all the more interesting and there will be more to follow on Day 5 regarding her statements.
 
(1:40 min)  Dr. Sucharit Bahakdi - (Microbiologist, Immunologist & Infection Epidemiologist, Germany)  Dr. Bahakdi opened with the comment that, ethically, whenever an experimental drug is being used that is proven to cause harm to any experimental group, use of that drug should be immediately stopped, and we have hundreds of thousands of examples of that.  Add to that harm the previous testimony by Dr. Krueger, that these vaccines cannot possibly work as described, makes the correct decision to immediately halt their use all the more clear.  He said that because the chemicals and lipid delivery structures  used are not only known to be harmful to people, none of them have ever been used before on humans, and "those who continue to do so have to go to jail.  There is no other way…  this cannot be allowed.  We now know the spike is a poison.  There is no doubt now that when you inject these vaccines you are putting poison into the body."  He continued to explain that "the brain full of tiny blood vessels, and so very sensitive and that the tiniest disturbance can lead to death of nerve cells and depending on where they are this can produce anything you want to think of.   Sure the whole thing may stop with a splitting headache which are the typical symptoms that clots are forming in the brain.  If you are lucky you will get palsy, you will lose vision or hearing."  He expressed concern that people report other peoples personalities are changing.  "The brain and the lymph system, this is you, the human being, everything you are is here [he points to his head].  Some people are getting Alzheimer's, some people are having symptoms that are horribly similar to Mad Cow Disease."  He stopped there at a loss for words.  "The vision is so horrible, so horrible."    He described several more examples most notably cancer tumors just exploding into action.  "Now we know that we are looking at an agent that has no benefit whatsoever, no benefit, zero, but has the capacity, over a million pathways, to kill you!  And [it] has been killing and is killing and is going to kill… children!

He mentioned a paper he saw recently that was so shocking to him that confirmed that 60 days after vaccination they could still find the poison in the blood.  This is very long lived, very unusual.  One could tell the man was expressively furious and trying to control himself and trying hard to remain calm.  "This, I am sorry to say, looks pre-meditated to me. No one can say I didn't realize…  Everything is published." He mentioned Michael Yeadon that will speak next, who will bring with him proof of this.  "Once it is discovered in maybe 15 cases then suddenly there will be thousands of examples."  He closed with his hope that once this happens the stock of these manufacturers will drop below the ground.  "This is my hope" , he said.

​(2:00 min)  Michael Yeadon - (32 years experience in the bio-pharmaceutical industry.  Biologist, Immunologist, toxicology, chemistry.  He was, 11 years ago, former Chief Scientist and VP of Pulmonary Research at Pfizer, United Kingdom/USA, and he spent ten years in the biotech sector.)   

Dr. Yeadon gave a lengthy and detailed testimony.  "I am speaking out today because these vaccines are very bad for you.  It is never appropriate to seek to invent, develop, manufacture and distribute a novel vaccine for a respiratory pathogen of such modest lethality, even if it was a bit worse than it is, because once you have done all the work necessary to establish that it is safe… its going to take far longer than any plausible expectation of the length of time a pandemic is going to be around.  It could never have been a proper thing to do, what they have claimed to have done, which they haven't done, it’s a fake vaccine, badly developed, badly designed."  He went on to speculate why possibly this was done.  He mentioned it could have been to make money, "to just rip everybody off.  For me the dominant reason was this control grid idea, that people would have to be vaccinated to qualify for a vaccine passport.  Another idea is to establish in peoples minds that these are legitimate products, that they could use them for other purposes."    He stopped there, except to add "its obvious why they used a vaccine based product.  It's because they are going to use them again."  He said "These [vaccines] are an entirely new kind of medical intervention.  Although they cunningly managed to disguise them with the word 'vaccine' the only thing they bear in common with traditional vaccines is the word.  That's it.  There's no other similarity. These [vaccines] are what I would call TOXIC BY DESIGN."  It was here that he brought up a good point that nobody had mentioned yet; that as a practice, when designing a vaccine you want to choose something that resembles the pathogen more than the person, because unless you do it that way there will be a high probability that the agent you use will cause an auto immune problem and he said this is what he believes they have done and that is was deliberate.  He also said there is nothing that he is aware of that tells us how long the spike protein poison will continue to be expressed, that it could be days, weeks, months, years.  "They were not required to state how long the effect would continue because this was a vaccine, and an experiment, and they were going down a development pathway that’s relatively light in terms of obligations of the innovator."  Yeadon said this product should have been classified as a genetic medicine, where the obligations are extremely onerous and all the questions would then have to have been answered.  " That is a catastrophic failure on the part of the regulators, who knew fine what I am saying is true because its convention.  I've never seen an exception. It should never be done again."  

His comments included a quote by Bill Gates who expressed concern they were not moving fast enough, that "next time we'll get it done in six months."  Yeadon spoke directly into the camera and warned "You must not let him do that. It is completely inappropriate and it's most certainly going to be harmful"  He continued with testimony cite problems with vaccine product consistency.  He said you cannot use the same manufacturing process you used to produce clinical material for trials.  You have to start again and make an industrial style process because you are going from a production level of tens of thousands to billions and you cannot scale that up.  This was after all his area of expertise, he said they did not do the things required.  He said he knows this because the manpower and resources required to go from drug substance to drug product in a case such as this, where the process is very complicated, mean that this industrial manufacturing process re-design "cannot be done in less than a number of years, at least five years he said."  He followed this statement with numerous examples in which this process was shortcut.  This is the reason for the variability of adverse events.  He called it "a criminal manufacture."  Of the regulators involved that allowed this to happen, he said they should be investigated because he believes there must have been "a criminal level of collusion." 

His closing comments had to do with vaccinating the entire planet.  He said it would never be wise to do that, which only goes to prove that this is not about public health but about establishing a control grid. and he gave four examples.  If this was really about public health, you would not vaccinate anyone who has already been infected because that is a reckless and dangerous thing to do.  Introducing high quantities of a thing they are already immune to will generate extreme responses and it may kill them.  You would not vaccinate people that are young and healthy.  You will harm and kill children.  Finally you would not vaccinate pregnant women, that is the worst thing you can do.  "We know from history never to do this."   He said you would never keep giving boosters, that that was another piece of fraud he could not understand.  Of the people giving testimony he said "we are not people being wise after the event."  Many knew from the way this was being rushed it could only result in utter disaster.  Lots of people tried to object and petition, all were censored, attacked and ignored.  " This whole thing, the entire thing, is a fraud."  He was asked if there was any way this could have been a mistake.  He replied; "no way at all, no possible way all four manufactures could have made the exact same set of mistakes, unless of course there was collusion"  

Reiner Fuellmich:  "We are rapidly moving into RICO territory now."
 
(2:30 min)  Dr. Sucharet Bhakdi returned briefly to add some comments:   He said  "All future mRNA products produced in the future are going to cause the same problems we are experiencing now"  He said these vaccines must never be allowed emergency use authorization because they  cannot be safely created within months.  Same goes for similar approvals, that we must say no right now.
 
(2:32 min) Antionetta Gatti -  (Physicist, Bio-Engineer, Nano-Pathologist, Italy)  (Blog Author Note:  I will try my best here to summarize her testimony however her accent was very thick and difficult for me to understand well.)    She discussed the nano-technology in the vaccines.  She explained that all biologists know that introducing mRNA in this way is difficult because it is not recognized by the body.  In other words, she is confirming that the body rejects it intuitively.  She said the body has no defenses against nanoparticles, mostly due to their size.  Nobody, and she ran down a list of orgs like FDA, CDC etc. has any experience using them in this way so there is currently no  quality control that is possible with such products.  Her investigation revealed that inside these products there is "something else"  some kind of "nano-entities"  and for those unfamiliar with these particles they may seem very strange, but she believes them to be "very outside the mission of the vaccine."  She said they are products of nano-technology that ought not be there and she thought they many were only present in some batches.  She thinks some of these things are hidden away in safes at Pfizer and that only they know and are keeping track of what things go in what batch and they are intentionally added.  At 2:40 min she began to show slides of what she saw.

This object found in the AZ vaccine below had many other nano-particulates inside of it:

Moderna:

(Above) She said these appear to be liposome's and RNA "kind of glued together"  Other particles she saw were elements that would be responsible for reports of magnetic effects and that she saw many particles that would be reactive in an electromagnetic field.  She saw many different things and there were more slides than I show here.  She agreed the presence of this many different things meant problems with quality control. 

She has experience with nanotech but this is the first time she has seen them in a fluid like this.  She knows very well how these particles behave within a cell and confirms they do interact with DNA and would be very dangerous.  She does not see any  possibility for the body to defend against such invaders.
 
Reiner Fuellmich:  Is there any possibility this material is there by accident?  She responded, no, they are "nano-technologically developed",  and it is her opinion that they are  "intentionally added" for some purpose. 
 
Antionetta Gatti - These tiny nano-entities can generate a magnetic field.  She published a paper on sudden infant death syndrome recently and findings that showed contaminations of aluminum and other particles.  Assuming this was a possible cause of death, (very hard to understand her), she continued explaining its wrong to vax pregnant women because this shows these nano particles can pass from mother to fetus during pregnancy and cause fatal damage.  (2:54min) What she sees in her images she said are components that can create organic or inorganic compounds, and generate new pathogens in the body.  These are things that can generate new mechanisms in the body due to the presence of these entities.
 
 
(2:56 min)  Professor/Dr. Arne Burkhard, (Pathologist, Germany)  Testimony began with his Autopsy and Histology study on vaccination - Associated complications and deaths.  International team of 8 pathologists, physicians and biologists, one physicist.  30 autopsies/4 biopsies, Histopathological (tissue microscopy) studies.  15 initial cases were analyzed by routine methods, 3 cases with advanced methods.

Dr. Burkhard gave a breakdown of the condition of the bodies he autopsied explaining that some had physical injuries from treatments given before death and this was taken into account.  In the case of two, the place of death was unknown.

Most unusual was evidence of lymphocytes "run amok" as he put it adding this was evidence of autoimmune disease being present.  He followed with a slide on the methods used in the procedure.  Spike proteins were seen in tissues.  In the slide below he pointed out abnormalities in the lining of capillaries.

The advanced tissue destruction depicted below was described:

The immunohistochemistry process used to detect spike proteins was explained with the slide below showing the end products that result from this spike infection. Additional slides were shown.

Below you can see this expression of this brown pigment lining the walls of blood vessels.  This is evidence of damage caused by spike protein to the walls of blood vessels.

There were two examples of death due to a ruptured aorta, which is the largest vessel in the body and part of the heart and he showed additional slides of this extreme degree of vascular damage, which also showed the presence of massive numbers of lymphocytes infiltrating the aorta wall with the associated inflammatory reaction.  Below are the incidence rates of various damage among the bodies that were examined:

Looking at spleen and liver tissue slides the Spleen had high levels of spike protein expression throughout while liver samples showed endothelial cell tissues that were strongly positive for spike protein.  In the spleen he saw "onion skin" inflammation of the arteries typical of lupus erythematosus (a severe autoimmune disease) and focal destruction of follicular arteries with prolapse of lymphatic follicular tissue, meaning these lymphocytes exert a pressure on the arteries of the spleen sufficient to cause rupturing of the vessel.
 
(Blog Author Note to readers:  The spleen is a small organ inside your left rib cage, just above the stomach. It's part of the lymphatic system (which is part of the immune system). The spleen stores and filters blood and makes white blood cells that protect you from infection. Many diseases and conditions can affect how the spleen works. A ruptured (torn) spleen can be fatal.)
 
Dr. Burkhard  continued:  Case 7 showed excessively proliferating lymphocytes.  Extensive damage to lymph nodes was seen including infarction (necrosis, tissue death).  The same lymphocyte infiltration was seen in heart tissue causing advanced stage disintegration of the muscle fibers, this being the likely contributory factor in cases of vaccine related myocarditis.  Lung tissue samples also showed dense infiltrations of lymphocytes.  Brain tissue was covered next, with red indicators marking changes in all 3 of these locations including:

Dr. Burkhard added an additional case report of a 76 year old man who had two different shots. The first dose was the AZ brand the second was the Pfizer's Comirnaty (Blog Author Note: Remember this is the so called FDA "approved" version of the Pfizer shot in the US that is really unavailable in the US)  Death occurred 238 days after the 2nd vaccination, histology included necrotizing encephalitis, vasculitis of the aorta and coronary artery and mild lymphocytic myocarditis.  Spike protein expression was also seen in the small vessel walls within the brain.  A summary slide of observed effects explaining what was meant by lymphocytes running "amok".  Again, more evidence of autoimmune disease.

Several more slides were shown including one of tissue from a man who died 6 days after injection showing some unidentified foreign material deposited inside a blood vessel.  This was a perplexing observation.  Nobody on the team or among several other doctors that it was sent to had ever seen this before and nobody what it is.  Dr. Burkhard suggested it may be accumulations of particulate vaccine material.  The same accumulations were seen inside of individual cells. Again, nobody knows what this material is. 

He also had a case of so called "Natural" death he uncovered as being caused by vaccine induced vasculitis of the coronary artery.  The man was 54 years old with the same two  mixed brand vaccinations as in the previous case who dies 123 days after the 2nd shot.  Histology included a texture disturbance and marked perivasculitis of the coronary artery with thrombus formation, some pre-existing arteriosclerosis, myocardial infarction AND lymphocytic myocarditis.  Biopsy specimens included an appendectomy, a bronchial biopsy and an excised skin lesion.  Spike protein expression was seen not so much inside but around the appendix. Bronchial sample was taken from a 26 year old male 9 months after vaccination.  Man was still complaining about breathing problems, heart palpitations, blood pressure irregularities, cough, shortness of breath, pain in right thorax and a recurrent fear of suffocation.  He had a 2 Pfizer vax from lot# EK9788 and EP9605. Also received a hepatitis vax in Dec 2021.  Bronchoscopy showed normal mucosal surface, no secretion, but histology showed marked inflammation of mucosa with eosinophilia (Blog Author Note: Eosinophils are a type of disease-fighting white blood cell. This condition most often indicates a parasitic infection, an allergic reaction or cancer.) and demonstrated spike protein in the endothelium and dendritic interepithelial cells.  No spike was found in the skin biopsy.  The teams concluded that they were not chasing some sort of phantom, that this is real, and attributable to vaccine exposure.
 
(3:33)  Professor/Dr. Bergholtz (Electrical Engineering, Germany)  Not a medical person but his contribution is in the science and quality of risk management and has 17 years experience.  Part of his commentary had to do with scaling up production of products discussed previously by Michael Yeadon with respect to vaccine manufacturing.  Provided a summary of the days proceedings thus far.  He presented 13 slides.  I will summarize his points in brief, but do watch his testimony since the slides present specific examples for each point.

1. Substantial non-conformities relating to the requirements of good manufacturing process will make the indemnification void.
2. The development process is seriously flawed therefore it is a serious non-conformity which cannot be excused by the urgency.
3. Stable mass production is highly unlikely.
4. Stable mass production has NOT been achieved.
5. Batches taken from unstable production periods can be deadly!
6. Extreme toxic batches are WAY BEYOND any statistical probability. The y-axis range for the graphs presented showing number of deaths on the y-axis and batch production on the x-axis was from 0-30 for much of the time but toxic batches were so off the scale the range of number of dead had to be extended to 3000.  Also those toxic batches were sent out to all 50 states, whereas the less dangerous batches only went to about 12 states.  strong evidence of premeditation to ensure toxic batches were evenly distributed intentionally in an effort to dilute the effects across a wider population.  (Blog Author Comment: This finding at first appeared to conflict with results published earlier by Craig Paardekooper who was able to show only certain states got toxic batches, like CA and KY, but after looking closely I noticed Dr. Bergholtz was graphing the entire distribution, whereas Craig was using information taken only from VAERS reports, therefore Dr. Bergholtz graph included the entire distribution and Craig's was only a sub set of that larger group.  In other words, BOTH men can be correct.)
7. Extreme fast waning of efficacy of the injections.  (Blog Author Comment:  Efficacy does not wane.  The active content becomes unstable and degrades.)
8. Strong negative efficacy for vaccinations!  He cites the number of covid cases in vaccinated populations here.
9. Dramatic increase in deaths compared to previous vaccines.  (Blog Author Comment:  His slide was labeled "real vaccinations" not "previous vaccinations" but when he explained the slide this was clearly his intended meaning)
10.  SERIOUS Non Conformity:  Detected presence of at least 3 types of undeclared objects in the injection liquids! Numerous microscopy investigations found objects resemble graphene oxide strips, graphene oxide was confirmed by Micro-Raman Spectrometry, fragments of microchips.
11. SERIOUS Non Conformity:  Mechanism for severe damage to organs by injection liquids established to be out of control spike production.  [Blog Author Comment:  Dr. Bergholtz emphasized there seems to be no control of how much, where and for how long spike production happens, however I know this to be untrue from my  own investigations.  These formulations are in fact designed specifically to attack certain organs with greater damaging effects, which has been revealed by loads of data and research papers.  (Blog Author Comment:While he correctly states that the spikes can be found in every part of the body, the vaccines ARE targeted bio-weapons in my personal opinion, that target reproductive organs and the brain demonstratively more severely, with heart liver and spleen following closely behind and in that order.  Just wanted to add that in here  -John)

 
(3:52min)  N. Ana Gardner - (Attorney, USA)  Raised a question posed to all present:  After reading a summary of several glaring examples of manufacturer negligence and study/product design flaws brought forward during the days testimonies she wanted to know if anyone knew of any other examples from history where similar examples of such recklessness occurred.  

-Dr. Sucharet Bhakdi offered the Swine Flu epidemic and vaccine in the early 1970's and the anthrax scare from 2001 as similar examples of misrepresentations and fear campaigns.  **Dr. Bhakdi could barley contain his anger and impatience with the process.  He so wants to see these people jailed immediately.  THEY MUST BE STOPPED! He repeated over and over.  (Reiner had to step in and reassure and console him it got so bad.)  Watching this part you could genuinely feel his contempt, please, you must watch this. These outbursts occurred around the 4:00 min mark.
 
-Professor/Dr. Alexandra Henrion-Claude (Geneticist, Specialist in RNA Research, Former Director of Research at ISERM, France)  Offered up the Dengue fever outbreak and vaccination.
 
(At approximately 4:08 min)  Virginia de Araujo-Recchia - (Attorney at Law)  She stepped up to help calm Dr. Bhakdi with a reading of 6 points of the Nuremberg code, asking him one at a time if each point was respected in his opinion.  To which, Dr. Bhakdi responded "No, of course not."  I believe this was an impromptu second attempt to reassure him once again of the legal teams confidence that the evidence they were presenting would have this result, so he could find the patience to let the process continue.  It appeared to work this time, although he was still visibly pained.
 
GROUP DISCUSSION:
 
On the question of efficacy being proven: how, when and to what degree was it proven?
 
-Dr. Sucharet Bhakdi -  "NOTHING IN THIS WHOLE SCAM HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN TO BE EFFICACIOUS."
​

How is it that this scam continues?

​(4:13 min)  Reiner Fuellmich:  On the question of why is this happening and how have so many people been made to agree on such measures?  "We have two experts for this"
 
Meredith Miller - (Psychologist, 16 years experience)  "Psychological abuse is far more damaging than physical abuse."  Meredith's expertise is in recognizing the signs of emotional abuse.  She brought up a applied behavioral study done by Yale in 2020.
 
She explained cognitive dissonance and its effects.  People have been subjected to this as an applied technique of marketing the covid scare and as a result have become unable to deal with it.  They withdraw from additional information and are unable to process it, becoming stuck in a kind of behavioral feedback loop.  They are in crisis.  A common coping response to stress is denial.  "If that is true, I cannot exist in a world like that"  The tendency is for them to want to see the good in an abuser.  These reactions are "level one" of this effect .  Level two is Stockholm Syndrome.
 
There are phases to Stockholm Syndrome, and she gave examples of where each one showed up in 2020.

1. Isolation from outside perspectives -  prolonging this results in irritability and aggression in social situations.
2. Disconnection - extended disconnection from society triggers feelings of "UNSAFE" and in this environment they are constantly bombarded with the repetition of that message, that they are not safe.  Even at work and everywhere they do go, this message is repeated and intensified.  This includes censorship, silencing, shaming and smearing of anyone providing that outside perspective they are being deprived of.
3. Perceived Acts of Kindness - The back and forth between idealization and devaluation between periods of reward and punishment.  (Blog Author Note:  Examples would be "two weeks to flatten the curve" and waves of variant virus paranoia with relaxed measures in between.)  Receiving an act of kindness is the idealization part.  What this pattern does is gets the victim relax their guard and trust the perpetrator more, and eventually work harder to get the reward, invest more in the goals and become obsessed with compliance based on the hope of getting that reward.  The word "perceived" is key here.  This is a psychological manipulation. This has been going on repeatedly since 2020.  Rewards of all kinds for getting vaccinated, privileges for compliance, punishments for refusals.   Getting back to normal becomes an all consuming desire.  Also releasing little bits of truth like a drug gets our hopes up and we begin to think we are going to be able at some point to move on from this.  But it never happens, and only gets worse.
4. The Perceived Life Threat - Introducing this threat places a person's autonomic nervous system in a state of collapse and they become both terrified and immobilized.  This is an advanced stage.  They may disassociate, they may "check out" which makes control and compliance a lot easier.  This can even lead to metabolic shut down and decreased immunity.  Being neurologically immobilized, numbed by the release of endogenous opioids, makes it hard to do anything about this.  This reaction by the autonomic nervous system is helpful when a person is going through pain but becomes mal-adaptive in this case, locking the person into this state.
5.  A Perceived Inability To Escape - After this goes on for a long time the person feels exhausted, the lose motivation to do anything to strive for anything.  The go into a state they call learned helplessness, also known as debility/dependence/dread, which becomes apathy.  A person becomes hopeless, they feel utterly powerless over their life, like everything is out of control.  They can even lose the "fight or flight" response, unable to find the energy to do either.  They certainly lack the access to higher brain functions like critical thinking, even imagination.  So if a person cannot even imagine a way out how are they going to ever get out?  You don’t need bars to contain such people.  They may go about their lives but it is a perceived inability to escape that jails them.  They come to believe their lives depend upon the perpetrator.  They even lose creativity.  Over time a person becomes spiritually bankrupt.  They lose all faith, and when that is gone they become empty.  They have no hope, no promise, no future and many people have been locked into this state.  (Blog Author Note:  This is where you need to be, this state of mind, to accept the "solutions" that will be offered to correct this, the "order" that will come out of this chaos.)  People will escape in fantasy, which is why we see increases in pornography, self-harm, and suicide.  Why is this happening?  Because peoples entire sense of reality is coming through the media, the social media, and through people who are also wrapped up in this narrative.  When a person is in this place the mentality is "I can't"  They learn that resistance is painful.  Example given was that of marital rape.

The Yale Study mentioned prior that is being discussed is called "Covid Vaccine Messaging". here's a link:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04460703
 
Their intention for doing this study was to figure out what kind of messaging would be most likely to get someone to get a covid vaccine.  Things like: Control, Personal freedom, Economic freedom, Self-interest, Community interest, Economic benefit, Guilt, Embarrassment, Anger, Trust in science, and "Not bravery"  They want to choose messaging that instills fear of unvaccinated people.  They also wanted to know how to instill vaccine confidence and persuade others and about peoples willingness to persuade others, their fear of unvaccinated people and about social judgment.  They want people to associate vaccination with trustworthiness likable-ness, and if you don't get vaccinated you are selfish and incompetent.  This was used to create the covid messaging you see every day.  Several examples were given like "Trust the Science"  All this shows how manipulative it is.  Firefighters are brave, but firefighters that choose not to get vaccinated are "Not Brave"  etc…   The most pernicious of these is community interest, in which the messaging there is designed to compel vaccination to protect society and communities and loved ones.  An example of gas-lighting is the message that "covid-19 is destroying the economy", which is not correct.  It is the imposition of covid regulations and restrictions that is doing that.  Messages like these are all red flags.  This is how the perpetrators get others to help them by doing their bidding.

(4:38 min)  Ariane Bileran - (Clinical Psychologist and Author, Specialty in Harassment and Psychopathology  -France)  "We are dealing with a totalitarian drift"  Paranoia is a contagious psychosis whose master piece is harassment.  It follows this structure:

- When an invisible or imaginary enemy attacks us we must go to war against the enemy and this justifies the use of harassment and all means are permitted, however the intention to harm is separated.  It is a means of persecution that leads to harassment.  Typical methods of harassment were used on the people who were subjected to repeated moral pressure and a way to maintain terror.  (Blog Author Note:  In Australia people who do not wear the masks — which more and more studies show are hazardous to health -- or who allegedly do not wear them correctly, are arrested, handcuffed, and thrown into jail.  In the Philippines, they run the risk of getting shot!)

With regard to criminality and harassment, the law allows for persecution of crimes that involve paranoia.  In such cases the intended recipient of such harassment must be clear.  In her diagnosis of this situation, paranoia was used on populations to instigate the harassment of individuals.  The consequences of this is seen on the condition of peoples mental health and the damage is considerable.  Multiple traumas have been inflicted:  Depression, suicide - especially among children, psychological disorganization, addictions, mental confusion, and schizophrenia. Mental disorders also affect the physical health of individuals.  Moral considerations no longer enter into discourse except to be used for attempts at blackmail and intimidation.  i.e. Individuals should be sacrificed for the good of the group.  Educational classes and healthcare services have been denied.  Any form of protest including simple questioning encounters censorship and oppression.  Individuals caught in this system are reduced to participants of experimentation and there are no longer any legal or spiritual limits. 

The actions that result in progressive phases of Stockholm syndrome explained by Meredith Miller were repeated. with some notable additions like what happened in Italy.  Messaging there included the repetition of opinions like the unvaccinated are "a rope around your neck" that warrants "bringing back the gas chambers."  In effect, the condoning of murder.  In France, being susceptible to anaphylactic shock is not an acceptable excuse for not being injected.  She gave examples of "conflict of loyalty" inflicted by creating "forced choices" that put people into impossible positions. i.e. the choice between the right to work and the right to our own body.  She gave examples of hypnotic suggestions that were inflicted by mass media through their use of images and messaging that instill panic.  Also censorship, persecution and repeated traumatic shocks.  She cited health officials in France that would release contradictory statements within weeks of each other and they would never address the reason for the change.  Use of generalized anomalies like not requiring injections in certain groups that make no sense.  They also used vaccination as an excuse for invading people intimate lives.  Suggesting that children are guilty of killing their grandmothers is an example of asymmetrical abuse by leaders.  A citizen is treated like a prisoner on parole.

​Repeated traumatic shocks are delivered not only by creating laws but by repeated messaging in mass media.  This has led to divisions in families, couples, and friendships that will be difficult to undo.  The media has reduced the population to a number defined by positive or negative, this has been done with hypnotic suggestions that provokes radical prohibition on thinking.  It promotes adherence to a religious type of faith.  The individual is not asked to analyze but rather just believe blindly.  Not doing so results in the individuals persecution and repression.  The repeating message says "the injection frees us from evil."  What followed were several quotes that led to the statement that society must not bend to predictions, that predictive models must be vetted against objective reality.  This collective delusion began with a faulty predictive model. 
 
(Blog Author Note:  from around 4:55 min onward the presenters  French accent became much more pronounced and made her testimony too difficult for me to accurately transcribe, but I did pick up enough to sort of follow along.  I suggest you play it back yourself for the rest.  You may have less difficulty than I did.)  She made some good points about why totalitarian rule succeeds and cited promises leaders make that are never fulfilled that prey on narcissistic tendencies that are displayed by individuals in a oppressed population where the people are seen as enemies.  In this model, rulers are rewarded and enriched and they rule by prediction, such that whatever they predict they also make happen.  It is a "purification" strategy, defining and separating the pure from the un-pure and the ends justifies the means.  "It is about normalizing a state of exception in which human rights are suspended."  She drew a parallel between the horrible way the Nazi's used outbreaks of typhus in Warsaw ghettos to our current situation with examples.  Totalitarians always use scientism to establish their legitimacy and existence and demand a kind of religious fervor.  "If we rely on statistics to rule out existence we are reduced to numbers, positive and negative, and can then be eliminated without any remorse."  (Ariane's testimony concluded at 5:14 min)

Group Discussion:
 
(5:14 min)  Reiner Fuellmich:  What kind of people are we dealing with? Are they psychopaths?
 
Meredith Miller - Psychopaths understand the difference between right and wrong but their conscience does not feel the weight of the guilt.  They feel superior to other people because they are not bothered by that empathy.  There is a feeling of grandiosity and entitlement that they should get away with it.
 
Reiner compared that attitude she described to criminals that commit gruesome deeds asking if it was the same.  Meredith explained that in the diagnostic manuals provided to psychologists there is a distinction that is made in which those who get caught are the overt types, whereas the covert types that tend not to be conduct activities in sophisticated ways and for that reason they tend to go much farther and avoid being caught.  Meredith explained that an abusive system is created by abusers and enablers and it is the enablers that keep that system functioning. The abusers need enablers to do that bidding for them.
 
(5:19 min)  Reiner Fuellmich:  How do we get out of this?
 
Ariane said totalitarianism stops when the masses talk to the elite finally, when enough people start to see the truth.  If the people in the society do not participate there is no totalitarianism.  Meredith said the biggest obstacle is the cognitive dissonance, that even if people have access to the information that it is difficult for them to even face the truth in that state.  The thing that keeps the abusers in control is the flattening of your self-worth, they have to destroy that.  They have to make you BELIEVE that you are not worthy of your basic human rights.  They need to violate your consent and that is the thing you will see repeated in the next pandemic and the next crisis.  A persons sense of self-worth is essential for them to rebuild otherwise they will think they are not worthy of those basic human rights.
 
(5:23 min)  Dexter L-J Ryneveldt (Attorney at Law, South Africa) -  "It comes down to consent.  It is apparent to me these are psychological laws designed to get voluntary consent from the populace."  He thinks this will be a defense when they pursue this further, that because of the psychological warfare they have been subjected to this consent cannot be considered valid. 
 
Meredith Miller agreed.  When people are not aware the deception is taking place they are not giving real consent.  She explained the strategy being employed by the abusers of Problem-Reaction-Solution.  They either manufacture a problem or take advantage of one already happening then they provoke your emotions and predict what your response is going to be so they can drive you to a particular solution.  The most sophisticated abusers will make you beg for that solution and make you think it was your idea all along.  She reminded the group of the Yale study message that read "trust the science" then quoted Fauci when he said "I am the science."
 
(5:27 min)  Ana Gardner:  With regard to Stockholm syndrome, she asked if Meredith thought everyone has been to some degree affected.  

Meredith Miller agreed, she thought they have, some more than others, but the key is their sense of self worth.  Not falling under this spell requires that they acknowledge their own human rights.  They must set boundaries.  Saying "No" sets those boundaries, and only a manipulator pushes beyond that.
 
(5:31 min)  Ariane Bileran - Stockholm syndrome ensues when the victim of harassment cannot escape, when they become trapped. There is a mechanism of survival.  The victim begins to anticipate what the abuser wants and tries to provide.  She was then asked if this explains people who surpass what is being demanded of them by abusers.  She agreed, saying this is an example of that survival mechanism, behavior changes as a result of a belief that doing more will help them avoid future suffering.  Another effect is the victims always mentally erase what they have suffered and maintain empathy for the abuser.  Abusers also employ and engage in paradoxical discourse.
 
(5:35 min)  Reiner Fuellmich:  So we not only need to tell people what has happened but we also need to overcome spiritual bankruptcy.  People need to understand that there is something out there worth fighting for.
 
Meredith Miller:  It is very helpful when pulling someone off the floor, because that is where they are, to find something important to that person that is beyond themselves, whether is be children or humanity, or God, that will reignite their spirit and empower them to get up and fight and shrug off the abuser, because in this state they don't think they are worth the effort, you must find something or someone that is worth it.
 
(5:38 min)  Ariane Bileran - Typically it is necessary to cut the bond between the victim and the harasser, but here it is not possible, but people come a little way forward and can create some distance by turning off the media.  They need to hear other discourses.
 
(5:45 min)  Reiner Fuellmich:  He basically asked what is the critical mass needed here?
 
Meredith Miller commented in response that she thought some people will never wake up and will take this to their grave and we don't need to wake them up, that its actually disrespectful to confront somebody that doesn't not want to listen.  She could not put a number on it, what the critical mass needed is but she thinks we will reach it and see some kind of shift that would maybe invite some kind of intervention from beyond that will help us achieve this process.

​

Blog Author Note: The discussion concluded with what I thought was an up note, on the power of every single individual, that the behavior of that one individual is also contagious.
 
I have said this many times and do it in practice myself,
​so I can tell you it does have an effect. 

If people see YOU say no. 
If they see YOU refuse and rebel,
if they see YOU defend YOUR rights and
proclaim YOUR self-worth to those that would destroy it,
if YOU refuse to give YOUR consent…
 
Seeing that will provide them with the permission they need to do the same.
 
Withdraw Your Consent
Refuse.
Just Say
NO!
​