The 3 major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were designed to prevent nothing more than a “mild case of COVID-19.” That means a cough, or chills and fever. Cough, or chills and fever, cure themselves naturally. No need for a vaccine.
*Watch as this effort continues how adverse reactions of every kind are normalized with common sense explanations many people, who were marginalized afterwards, gave to object to covid danger and death rate hysteria. i.e. Old people are dying in droves. No, they are just old. No, they are infected. Fast forward to vaccine programs- Old people are dying in droves, well that is to be expected, they are old.
This is the very definition of cognitive dissonance, the simultaneous adoption of two opposing beliefs, which results in faulty reasoning, which in turn opens a mental door through which a fallacious argument can enter.
Belief #1 : Old people are vulnerable and in need of protection.
Belief #2 : Subjecting them to harsh treatments that are likely to produce harsh consequences is a reasonable way to head off harsh consequences.
Fallacious Argument: Vaccinate them to "protect" them.
Pre rollout: Pfizer and BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine VRBPAC Briefing Document cite 6 deaths in trials.
*Watch as this effort continues how adverse reactions of every kind are normalized with common sense explanations many people, who were marginalized afterwards, gave to object to covid danger and death rate hysteria. i.e. Old people are dying in droves. No, they are just old. No, they are infected. Fast forward to vaccine programs- Old people are dying in droves, well that is to be expected, they are old.
This is the very definition of cognitive dissonance, the simultaneous adoption of two opposing beliefs, which results in faulty reasoning, which in turn opens a mental door through which a fallacious argument can enter.
Belief #1 : Old people are vulnerable and in need of protection.
Belief #2 : Subjecting them to harsh treatments that are likely to produce harsh consequences is a reasonable way to head off harsh consequences.
Fallacious Argument: Vaccinate them to "protect" them.
Pre rollout: Pfizer and BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine VRBPAC Briefing Document cite 6 deaths in trials.
It is also worthy to note here that of the possible adverse effects listed initially in the FDA briefing draft, SOME of those are adverse reactions that garner special interest and study by the CDC while others, like Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneropathy and meningitis do not. In trying to make a layman determination as to the criteria for choosing which adverse reactions demand special analysis and further write ups it appears that some of these reactions are short term, immediate and demonstratively extreme, like stroke, narcolepsy, seizures, anaphylaxis and death, while others might be more easily explained away or worse, left completely unexplained, as occurrences that resulted from an unforeseen or undiagnosed pre-existing condition, specifically symptoms that manifest as a result of slower moving diseases which would naturally show up far enough into the future following a covid vaccination as to be dismissed as unrelated.
In simple terms, the agencies charged with tracking vaccination program outcomes are cherry picking probable adverse reactions in an effort to intentionally downplay serious concerns in favor of continuing these programs in spite of the risks they pose to the general public at large.
With all that being said upfront,
let's start the countdown
to REVOLUTION!
let's start the countdown
to REVOLUTION!
12-14-20 Pfizer-BioNTech product. Restricted in UK from people with allergies, severe reactions requiring resuscitation measures:
UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency advises: "Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available".
Keep in mind as you read this here that, if the all the lackeys clamoring to give you the PCR brain tickler swab are any indication, covid vaccinations are quite likely to be administered by just about anyone able to hold a syringe in the US eventually.
According to the FDA's official guidelines, "You should not get the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine if you..."
1) had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of this vaccine. Well that's helpful, considering its brand new and nobody has ever had a previous dose of this poison.
2) had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient of this vaccine."
Oh, thanks much! Here, go ahead and take these down. Got a pen?
mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose."
With the exception of sucrose, which is just common sugar, what are the chances you are likely to find any of these ingredients listed on the restaurant menu beside the house salad? Or on the drive up menu at McDonalds? (And who knows what is really in McDonald's cheeseburgers these days?) I have been tested for allergies before. It involves pricking you about a hundred times with a battery of common allergens and getting results takes months to complete as you follow dietary restrictions etc... just to narrow down the reasons why you might have had a ridiculously bad week following eating at a place you can't recall. Nobody ever really knows what the fuck they are allergic to until they eat it!
FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn didn't feel this information needed to be spread widely since "We do not think that this is a, highly frequent issue that will arise, but... [beware of anything following the word 'but'] we do want to be careful because vaccine safety, medical product safety is top of mind for us." Is it? Really?
Stephan Hahn apparently has no idea how frequent allergic reactions are!
According to WebMD, “more than 50 million Americans suffer from allergies each year.” (That's roughly 1 in 6 you jackass!) 200,000 people come to the ER with food allergies. 4-5% of the population have food allergies. Who can say, with certainty, how many Americans would experience, say, life- threatening anaphylactic shock from the COVID vaccine?
On a personal note, do you know how I discovered I was allergic to Erythromycin? Due to a severe infection I got following a foot surgery it was administered to me in a hospital through an aortic catheter! That was a horrible experience. Had I been casually administered that drug intravenously in a Walgreen's, like so many flu shots, I would be DEAD!
Denver Post: “Documents published by the two [vaccine] companies [Pfizer and BioNTech] showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from the [clinical vaccine] trials, and doctors were advised to look out for such reactions in trial participants who weren’t previously known to have severe allergies.”
So, in other words, the clinical trials were already biased, because they excluded people with a history of allergic reactions. This way the vaccine performance would appear safer. And NOW, as if it’s nothing more than an afterthought, we get---“Oh, by the way, if people have allergies, they shouldn’t take the vaccine.”
It is my hope that people reading this will consider the danger and if what I shared here helps you dodge a bullet, that's good. But the fight is no where near being over, because the way things are going, if having allergies means 'no soup for you' that will later mean: no travel, no dining, no shopping, no physical contact, no education, no job, no leaving home, no hotel stays, and on and on, and onnnnnn....
sources include: John Rappoport/Forbes/Denver Post and my own editorial commentary.
Had Enough Yet?
RSS Feed