I hope everyone had a nice holiday weekend, I know I did. Here in the US, around July 4th we have a whole bunch of traditions to celebrate Independence Day, and it was a much needed respite for me. But now its time to get back to working the problems at hand, new and old, but thanks to the lab guys at Orwell City, mostly new.
If you haven't read the post before this one, published on July 1st, you might want to do that. It is all about the discovery that all these covid vaccine formulations are comprised of practically nothing else but GRAPHENE OXIDE, a toxic industrial chemical that, aside from being LETHAL, has some very interesting properties that we need to start paying very close attention to.
Jack Campbell over at Axiom has been working hard to get this information out every way he can to everyone he can. The two of us thought that it was time to cover all that stuff in a casual interview, something you can possibly listen to on a commute or wherever. So that is what this is chat is all about.
If you haven't read the post before this one, published on July 1st, you might want to do that. It is all about the discovery that all these covid vaccine formulations are comprised of practically nothing else but GRAPHENE OXIDE, a toxic industrial chemical that, aside from being LETHAL, has some very interesting properties that we need to start paying very close attention to.
Jack Campbell over at Axiom has been working hard to get this information out every way he can to everyone he can. The two of us thought that it was time to cover all that stuff in a casual interview, something you can possibly listen to on a commute or wherever. So that is what this is chat is all about.
The Axiom World Alliance Interviews Me
Finding a CURE for the "cure"
*NOTE: This was originally a podbean link but it was censored and removed from their website, so to make this available I had to upload the raw unedited tape so please begin listening after the 11 minute mark, that is when the interview began. I apologize for any quality issues and unrelated discussion that was previously edited out. The bulk of this I thought was good and needed to be available to people.
Finding a CURE for the "cure"
*NOTE: This was originally a podbean link but it was censored and removed from their website, so to make this available I had to upload the raw unedited tape so please begin listening after the 11 minute mark, that is when the interview began. I apologize for any quality issues and unrelated discussion that was previously edited out. The bulk of this I thought was good and needed to be available to people.
Over the last couple days I found some other things, links and articles that track with what I talk about so you can see some of this evidence right now. Those are below. If you or someone you know has been recently vaccinated try some of these tests out yourself.
These simple tests are easy to do, just remember, if you are looking for magnetic effects or electrical conductivity there are variables here to be aware of that may impact whatever results you can readily obtain. Not having any is a good thing, but it does not prove others have none. The whole point of this drill is to test yourself and others that are curious and willing to help you discover things about this, and it does not matter if you are trying to prove it or disprove it. Just see if you find what others are finding and share that information, but if you value your YouTube or Twitter account it's probably best not to share it there because you will find your accounts will be shut down... FAST!
Graphene oxide disperses and travels throughout the body, this is not instantaneous. If you just got a covid vaccination check your injection site. If you got it a month or two ago, check elsewhere.
If you have been vaccinated and do not find electrical or magnetic effects you may have gotten a placebo dose. You may not have sufficient accumulations in your head to cause this effect. You may have really high glutathione levels and managed to naturally detox significantly. This would be unusual, but it is possible.
You may also not be near enough or exposed enough to a 5G transmitter. These effects are much more pronounced when you are (please DO NOT try to get near one you know about just to test these things out since that might possibly kill you)
These simple tests are easy to do, just remember, if you are looking for magnetic effects or electrical conductivity there are variables here to be aware of that may impact whatever results you can readily obtain. Not having any is a good thing, but it does not prove others have none. The whole point of this drill is to test yourself and others that are curious and willing to help you discover things about this, and it does not matter if you are trying to prove it or disprove it. Just see if you find what others are finding and share that information, but if you value your YouTube or Twitter account it's probably best not to share it there because you will find your accounts will be shut down... FAST!
Graphene oxide disperses and travels throughout the body, this is not instantaneous. If you just got a covid vaccination check your injection site. If you got it a month or two ago, check elsewhere.
If you have been vaccinated and do not find electrical or magnetic effects you may have gotten a placebo dose. You may not have sufficient accumulations in your head to cause this effect. You may have really high glutathione levels and managed to naturally detox significantly. This would be unusual, but it is possible.
You may also not be near enough or exposed enough to a 5G transmitter. These effects are much more pronounced when you are (please DO NOT try to get near one you know about just to test these things out since that might possibly kill you)
LUCIFERASE BEING PICKED UP BY VACCINE VICTIMS USING A BLACK LIGHT https://www.bitchute.com/video/xWzFsxVhcfZE/
STEW PETERS INTERVIEWS DR. JANE RUBY - SCIENTIFIC PROOF COVID INJECTIONS ARE MASS POISONING! https://www.bitchute.com/video/zWALHa8c8wFm/ TESTING OF A PROPERLY DILUTED COVID VACCINE SHOT DOSAGE CONFIRMS 6 NANOGRAMS PER UL OF RNA AND 747 NANOGRAMS OF GRAPHENE OXIDE! THAT WORKS OUT TO THESE SHOTS BEING 99.99103% GRAPHENE OXIDE!
GRAPHENE OXIDE FOUND IN ASTRAZENECA VACCINE | LA QUITA COLUMNA https://www.bitchute.com/video/rIA2r0okVMxO/
GRAPHENE OXIDE FOUND IN ASTRAZENECA VACCINE | LA QUITA COLUMNA https://www.bitchute.com/video/rIA2r0okVMxO/
FINDING MAGNETIC MEATS IN YOUR LOCAL GROCERY STORE AISLE?
https://www.acrobiosystems.com/C38-COVID-19-R-D.html
Lets see what you all make of this.
MAGNETISM IN PEOPLE IS CAUSED BY GRAPHENE OXIDE CLAIMS LAWSUIT 6-26-2021 https://rumble.com/vj3g6b-magnetism-in-people-is-caused-by-graphene-oxide-claims-lawsuit-6-26-2021.html This is from one of the research links posted by La Quinta Columna. Ignore the CDC explanation of vaccine adjuvants the guy on this clip shows. Vaccine adjuvants are almost all toxic chemicals, and yes, they aggravate the immune system, all toxins do that, but the purpose of these ingredients is to simulate an immune response to the disease a particular vaccine is supposed to provide immunity to. You need to think about this. If vaccines are supposed to be immunizing you to a disease by exposing you to a weakened element of that disease pathogen or its bio-markings then why are additional adjuvants needed? They aren't. This is how vaccine manufacturers fraudulently create the appearance of 'effectiveness". This is how that ruse has always been accomplished and covid vaccines are no exception.
https://www.acrobiosystems.com/C38-COVID-19-R-D.html
Lets see what you all make of this.
MAGNETISM IN PEOPLE IS CAUSED BY GRAPHENE OXIDE CLAIMS LAWSUIT 6-26-2021 https://rumble.com/vj3g6b-magnetism-in-people-is-caused-by-graphene-oxide-claims-lawsuit-6-26-2021.html This is from one of the research links posted by La Quinta Columna. Ignore the CDC explanation of vaccine adjuvants the guy on this clip shows. Vaccine adjuvants are almost all toxic chemicals, and yes, they aggravate the immune system, all toxins do that, but the purpose of these ingredients is to simulate an immune response to the disease a particular vaccine is supposed to provide immunity to. You need to think about this. If vaccines are supposed to be immunizing you to a disease by exposing you to a weakened element of that disease pathogen or its bio-markings then why are additional adjuvants needed? They aren't. This is how vaccine manufacturers fraudulently create the appearance of 'effectiveness". This is how that ruse has always been accomplished and covid vaccines are no exception.
ANOTHER CLUE - THE GRAPHENE MAGIC ANGLE https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bad38UlM2i7d/ Fast-Forward to the very end of this clip to see how graphene reacts to specific frequencies of light (EMF), you see how it immediately organizes into strings and the point here is the comparison to chem-trail cloud formations. The SAME EFFECT is present!
What Is Radiation Pneumonitis and How Is It Treated?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=radiation+pneumonitis+symptoms&atb=v229-1&ia=web
https://www.healthline.com/health/radiation-pneumonitis
Radiation pneumonitis is a type of lung injury. While pneumonia is caused by bacteria or viruses, pneumonitis is caused by an irritant, similar to an allergy. Radiation pneumonitis happens to some people after they’ve received radiation treatments to their lungs or chest area. Between 5 and 15 percent of people receiving radiation treatment for lung cancer develop pneumonitis. However, anyone receiving radiation therapy to the chest can develop it.
While it tends to happen about 4 to 12 weeks after radiation treatment, it can develop as early as 1 week after treatment. In other cases, it develops very slowly over the course of several months.
What are the symptoms?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=radiation+pneumonitis+symptoms&atb=v229-1&ia=web
https://www.healthline.com/health/radiation-pneumonitis
Radiation pneumonitis is a type of lung injury. While pneumonia is caused by bacteria or viruses, pneumonitis is caused by an irritant, similar to an allergy. Radiation pneumonitis happens to some people after they’ve received radiation treatments to their lungs or chest area. Between 5 and 15 percent of people receiving radiation treatment for lung cancer develop pneumonitis. However, anyone receiving radiation therapy to the chest can develop it.
While it tends to happen about 4 to 12 weeks after radiation treatment, it can develop as early as 1 week after treatment. In other cases, it develops very slowly over the course of several months.
What are the symptoms?
(Dyspnea is shortness of breath)
Anyone recall how covid was first described?
Physicians in Wuhan, China were looking at radio-graphs of infected lung tissue and said "IT LOOKED LIKE CRUSHED GLASS IN THE LUNGS!" Here is what they were looking at. It is EXACTLY THE SAME EFFECT seen in a radio graph of a lung cancer patient undergoing radiation therapy!
Anyone recall how covid was first described?
Physicians in Wuhan, China were looking at radio-graphs of infected lung tissue and said "IT LOOKED LIKE CRUSHED GLASS IN THE LUNGS!" Here is what they were looking at. It is EXACTLY THE SAME EFFECT seen in a radio graph of a lung cancer patient undergoing radiation therapy!
The main symptoms of radiation pneumonitis include:
Shortness of breath, dry cough, feeling of fullness in your chest, flu-like symptoms
These symptoms are very similar to those of both pneumonia and lung cancer. In addition, radiation therapy can cause similar side effects, even in people who don’t develop radiation pneumonitis. As a result, many people ignore these symptoms and don’t get treatment.
What causes it?
Radiation therapy works by killing or damaging cancerous cells. During this process, it can also irritate other structures, including noncancerous cells and tissue. In the case of radiation pneumonitis, it causes inflammation of the small air sacs, called alveoli, in your lungs. This makes it harder for oxygen to pass through your alveoli and into your bloodstream.
Are there any risk factors?
Some people are more likely than others to develop radiation pneumonitis after radiation treatment. The biggest factor involves the size of the area receiving radiation treatment. The larger the area, the higher the risk of developing radiation pneumonitis. However, some newer, computer-assisted radiation techniques reduce this risk by delivering radiation more precisely.
Other things that can increase your risk include:
receiving higher doses of radiation, having poor lung function prior to treatment, being female, being older, and smoking.
In addition, taking chemotherapy drugs while receiving radiation therapy can also increase your risk. Chemotherapy drugs that may increase your risk include:
actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, methotrexate, mitomycin, doxorubicin
Shortness of breath, dry cough, feeling of fullness in your chest, flu-like symptoms
These symptoms are very similar to those of both pneumonia and lung cancer. In addition, radiation therapy can cause similar side effects, even in people who don’t develop radiation pneumonitis. As a result, many people ignore these symptoms and don’t get treatment.
What causes it?
Radiation therapy works by killing or damaging cancerous cells. During this process, it can also irritate other structures, including noncancerous cells and tissue. In the case of radiation pneumonitis, it causes inflammation of the small air sacs, called alveoli, in your lungs. This makes it harder for oxygen to pass through your alveoli and into your bloodstream.
Are there any risk factors?
Some people are more likely than others to develop radiation pneumonitis after radiation treatment. The biggest factor involves the size of the area receiving radiation treatment. The larger the area, the higher the risk of developing radiation pneumonitis. However, some newer, computer-assisted radiation techniques reduce this risk by delivering radiation more precisely.
Other things that can increase your risk include:
receiving higher doses of radiation, having poor lung function prior to treatment, being female, being older, and smoking.
In addition, taking chemotherapy drugs while receiving radiation therapy can also increase your risk. Chemotherapy drugs that may increase your risk include:
actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, methotrexate, mitomycin, doxorubicin
THERE IS NO COVID!
THERE IS HOWEVER GRAPHENE OXIDE POISONING!
THERE IS HOWEVER GRAPHENE OXIDE POISONING!
AMAZON CONFIRMS PLANS ON REMOVING NAC SUPPLEMENTS - Another attempt by the FDA to REMOVE treatment options! https://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/regulatory/amazon-confirms-plans-removing-nac-supplements
The executive of a supplement brand, who agreed to speak on condition of anonymity, said its NAC products were removed a few weeks ago, subsequently reinstated last week, then removed again this week.
“We still don’t know the full story of ‘why’ on this, other than Amazon seems to have been spooked and, we think, overreacted regarding the pharma patent on NAC,” the industry source said.
In response to questions about NAC-containing supplements sold through another e-commerce giant—eBay—an eBay spokeswoman responded in an email, “We regularly work with the FDA and remove listings for products that have received warnings and/or recalls.”
The eBay spokeswoman did not immediately respond to follow-up questions whether eBay has started to remove NAC-containing supplements from its website. As of late Wednesday, such products remained available for sale on eBay’s website through several different supplement brands.
The executive of a supplement brand, who agreed to speak on condition of anonymity, said its NAC products were removed a few weeks ago, subsequently reinstated last week, then removed again this week.
“We still don’t know the full story of ‘why’ on this, other than Amazon seems to have been spooked and, we think, overreacted regarding the pharma patent on NAC,” the industry source said.
In response to questions about NAC-containing supplements sold through another e-commerce giant—eBay—an eBay spokeswoman responded in an email, “We regularly work with the FDA and remove listings for products that have received warnings and/or recalls.”
The eBay spokeswoman did not immediately respond to follow-up questions whether eBay has started to remove NAC-containing supplements from its website. As of late Wednesday, such products remained available for sale on eBay’s website through several different supplement brands.
I hear people tell me I am wrong, that they do research and they know things...
OK... How many of you "researchers" out there have read this book?
OK... How many of you "researchers" out there have read this book?
Learn about Louis Pasteur and his 'theory of germs' here:
https://www.amazon.com/Private-Science-Pasteur-Princeton-Library/dp/0691604975
In The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist's laboratory work. Geison uses Pasteur's laboratory notebooks, made available only recently, and his published papers to present a rich and full account of some of the most famous episodes in the history of science and their darker sides--for example, Pasteur's rush to develop the rabies vaccine and the human risks his haste entailed. The discrepancies between the public record and the "private science" of Louis Pasteur tell us as much about the man as they do about the highly competitive and political world he learned to master.
Although experimental ingenuity served Pasteur well, he also owed much of his success to the polemical virtuosity and political savvy that won him unprecedented financial support from the French state during the late nineteenth century. But a close look at his greatest achievements raises ethical issues. In the case of Pasteur's widely publicized anthrax vaccine, Geison reveals its initial defects and how Pasteur, in order to avoid embarrassment, secretly incorporated a rival colleague's findings to make his version of the vaccine work. Pasteur's premature decision to apply his rabies treatment to his first animal-bite victims raises even deeper questions and must be understood not only in terms of the ethics of human experimentation and scientific method, but also in light of Pasteur's shift from a biological theory of immunity to a chemical theory--similar to ones he had often disparaged when advanced by his competitors.
Through his vivid reconstruction of the professional rivalries as well as the national adulation that surrounded Pasteur, Geison places him in his wider cultural context. In giving Pasteur the close scrutiny his fame and achievements deserve, Geison's book offers compelling reading for anyone interested in the social and ethical dimensions of science.
Originally published in 1995.
https://www.amazon.com/Private-Science-Pasteur-Princeton-Library/dp/0691604975
In The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist's laboratory work. Geison uses Pasteur's laboratory notebooks, made available only recently, and his published papers to present a rich and full account of some of the most famous episodes in the history of science and their darker sides--for example, Pasteur's rush to develop the rabies vaccine and the human risks his haste entailed. The discrepancies between the public record and the "private science" of Louis Pasteur tell us as much about the man as they do about the highly competitive and political world he learned to master.
Although experimental ingenuity served Pasteur well, he also owed much of his success to the polemical virtuosity and political savvy that won him unprecedented financial support from the French state during the late nineteenth century. But a close look at his greatest achievements raises ethical issues. In the case of Pasteur's widely publicized anthrax vaccine, Geison reveals its initial defects and how Pasteur, in order to avoid embarrassment, secretly incorporated a rival colleague's findings to make his version of the vaccine work. Pasteur's premature decision to apply his rabies treatment to his first animal-bite victims raises even deeper questions and must be understood not only in terms of the ethics of human experimentation and scientific method, but also in light of Pasteur's shift from a biological theory of immunity to a chemical theory--similar to ones he had often disparaged when advanced by his competitors.
Through his vivid reconstruction of the professional rivalries as well as the national adulation that surrounded Pasteur, Geison places him in his wider cultural context. In giving Pasteur the close scrutiny his fame and achievements deserve, Geison's book offers compelling reading for anyone interested in the social and ethical dimensions of science.
Originally published in 1995.
THERE!
NOW, Please...
EVERYONE STOP QUOTING THE NIGHTLY NEWS TO EACH OTHER.
GO OUT THERE AND DO SOME REAL RESEARCH!
NOW, Please...
EVERYONE STOP QUOTING THE NIGHTLY NEWS TO EACH OTHER.
GO OUT THERE AND DO SOME REAL RESEARCH!
RSS Feed